PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARA vs. HAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MARA vs. HAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and Halliburton Company (HAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARA achieves a 56.79% return, which is significantly higher than HAL's 41.41% return. Over the past 10 years, MARA has underperformed HAL with an annualized return of -10.09%, while HAL has yielded a comparatively higher 0.88% annualized return.


MARA

1D
3.45%
1M
10.43%
YTD
56.79%
6M
22.22%
1Y
-11.00%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
-11.91%
10Y*
-10.09%

HAL

1D
-0.40%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
41.41%
6M
39.63%
1Y
84.34%
3Y*
9.02%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
0.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARA vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MARA
MARA Holdings, Inc.
56.79%-46.45%-28.61%586.84%-89.59%214.75%1,084.48%-39.16%-91.17%-40.41%
HAL
Halliburton Company
41.41%7.02%-23.19%-6.47%74.45%21.99%-21.23%-4.90%-44.63%-8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MARA and HAL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2012

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MARA:

$5.35B

HAL:

$33.22B

EPS

MARA:

-$4.95

HAL:

$1.82

PS Ratio

MARA:

6.68

HAL:

1.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

MARA:

$867.82M

HAL:

$22.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MARA:

$164.95M

HAL:

$3.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

MARA:

$373.68M

HAL:

$3.83B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MARA vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARA
MARA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MARA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARA Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MARA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARA Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

HAL
HAL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARA vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MARAHALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.36

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

6.47

-6.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.26

16.47

-16.73

MARA vs. HAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARA Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the HAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARA and HAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MARA vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARA drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, which is greater than HAL's maximum drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARA and HAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARAHALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.74%

-92.99%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.53%

-13.10%

-57.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.34%

-54.01%

-24.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.87%

-54.01%

-41.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.20%

-91.45%

-7.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.90%

-32.89%

-58.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.00%

-39.12%

-38.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.56%

5.14%

+37.42%

Volatility

MARA vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison

MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) has a higher volatility of 23.71% compared to Halliburton Company (HAL) at 9.32%. This indicates that MARA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARAHALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.71%

9.32%

+14.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.50%

24.13%

+36.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.29%

36.76%

+42.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

105.98%

40.18%

+65.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

144.15%

45.96%

+98.19%

Dividends

MARA vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison

MARA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAL
Halliburton Company
1.72%2.41%2.50%1.77%1.22%0.79%1.67%2.94%2.71%1.47%1.33%2.12%
MARA
MARA Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MARA vs. HAL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MARA Holdings, Inc. and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
174.61M
5.40B
(MARA) Total Revenue
(HAL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MARA and HAL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MARA has higher volatility (23.71%) compared to HAL (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARA dropped -99.74% vs HAL's -92.99%.

HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MARA and HAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer