PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MARA vs. CLSK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MARA and CLSK is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

MARA vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-9.64%
-37.19%
MARA
CLSK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MARA:

0.21

CLSK:

0.42

Sortino Ratio

MARA:

1.16

CLSK:

1.56

Omega Ratio

MARA:

1.13

CLSK:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

MARA:

0.24

CLSK:

0.54

Martin Ratio

MARA:

0.59

CLSK:

1.24

Ulcer Index

MARA:

36.78%

CLSK:

39.46%

Daily Std Dev

MARA:

105.44%

CLSK:

115.93%

Max Drawdown

MARA:

-99.74%

CLSK:

-98.56%

Current Drawdown

MARA:

-87.36%

CLSK:

-84.89%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MARA:

$6.64B

CLSK:

$3.33B

EPS

MARA:

$0.83

CLSK:

-$0.64

PEG Ratio

MARA:

0.00

CLSK:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

MARA:

$441.98M

CLSK:

$305.18M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MARA:

-$109.55M

CLSK:

$77.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

MARA:

$295.10M

CLSK:

-$42.76M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARA achieves a 13.95% return, which is significantly lower than CLSK's 19.00% return.


MARA

YTD

13.95%

1M

-2.00%

6M

-9.65%

1Y

17.76%

5Y*

83.95%

10Y*

-15.66%

CLSK

YTD

19.00%

1M

-1.62%

6M

-37.19%

1Y

54.37%

5Y*

16.09%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MARA vs. CLSK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MARA is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MARA is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MARA is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MARA is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MARA is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MARA is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

CLSK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLSK is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLSK is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLSK is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLSK is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLSK is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLSK is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MARA vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MARA, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.210.51
The chart of Sortino ratio for MARA, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.161.67
The chart of Omega ratio for MARA, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.131.18
The chart of Calmar ratio for MARA, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.260.66
The chart of Martin ratio for MARA, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.591.50
MARA
CLSK

The current MARA Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the CLSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARA and CLSK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.21
0.51
MARA
CLSK

Dividends

MARA vs. CLSK - Dividend Comparison

Neither MARA nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.26%

Drawdowns

MARA vs. CLSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARA drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARA and CLSK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-74.29%
-84.89%
MARA
CLSK

Volatility

MARA vs. CLSK - Volatility Comparison

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) have volatilities of 25.92% and 26.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%50.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
25.92%
26.92%
MARA
CLSK

Financials

MARA vs. CLSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. and CleanSpark, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab