MAP.MC vs. GFI
MAP.MC (Mapfre) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. MAP.MC operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services), while GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, MAP.MC returned 14.45%/yr vs 27.04%/yr for GFI. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MAP.MC vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MAP.MC is traded in EUR, while GFI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GFI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAP.MC achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -12.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MAP.MC has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 14.45%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 27.04% annualized return.
MAP.MC
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 29.44%
- 3Y*
- 36.98%
- 5Y*
- 24.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.45%
GFI
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -16.52%
- YTD
- -12.64%
- 6M
- -12.35%
- 1Y
- 47.43%
- 3Y*
- 35.99%
- 5Y*
- 33.24%
- 10Y*
- 27.04%
MAP.MC vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP.MC Mapfre | -1.65% | 82.89% | 33.09% | 13.84% | 7.00% | 22.38% | -27.04% | 7.69% | -8.22% | -2.82% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -12.64% | 200.03% | -0.08% | 40.55% | 3.42% | 32.56% | 31.23% | 93.75% | -12.84% | 27.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAP.MC and GFI is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007 | 0.02 |
The correlation between MAP.MC and GFI shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (10 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAP.MC vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
MAP.MC
GFI
MAP.MC vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mapfre (MAP.MC) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAP.MC | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.19 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 1.22 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.69 | 3.28 | +1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAP.MC vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAP.MC drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -84.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAP.MC and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAP.MC | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -84.84% | +21.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.97% | -41.86% | +25.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.97% | -41.86% | +25.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | -50.57% | +29.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.42% | -64.47% | +12.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.56% | -36.89% | +34.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.21% | -41.46% | +22.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.15% | 15.49% | -9.34% |
Volatility
MAP.MC vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mapfre (MAP.MC) is 5.52%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 16.78%. This indicates that MAP.MC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAP.MC | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 16.78% | -11.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.13% | 44.48% | -27.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.48% | 58.13% | -36.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.30% | 50.32% | -29.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.17% | 53.21% | -28.04% |
Dividends
MAP.MC vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
MAP.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than GFI's 5.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.04% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
MAP.MC Mapfre | 3.88% | 3.90% | 5.15% | 6.09% | 6.82% | 7.53% | 8.57% | 6.20% | 6.30% | 5.46% | 4.23% | 6.06% |
Financials
MAP.MC vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mapfre and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MAP.MC and GFI have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MAP.MC and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer