PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAP.MC vs. BBY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAP.MC vs. BBY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Mapfre (MAP.MC) and Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MAP.MC is traded in EUR, while BBY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BBY.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAP.MC achieves a -7.42% return, which is significantly lower than BBY.L's 16.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MAP.MC has underperformed BBY.L with an annualized return of 11.57%, while BBY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.32% annualized return.


MAP.MC

1D
-0.31%
1M
-3.59%
YTD
-7.42%
6M
-0.99%
1Y
20.40%
3Y*
33.30%
5Y*
22.03%
10Y*
11.57%

BBY.L

1D
1.16%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
16.38%
6M
14.81%
1Y
59.77%
3Y*
32.84%
5Y*
24.92%
10Y*
14.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAP.MC vs. BBY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAP.MC
Mapfre
-7.42%81.75%32.67%14.03%6.95%20.15%-28.02%6.52%-9.17%-3.85%
BBY.L
Balfour Beatty plc
16.38%51.78%48.27%3.21%26.58%5.03%-2.25%14.04%-15.92%7.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MAP.MC and BBY.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAP.MC vs. BBY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAP.MC
MAP.MC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MAP.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BBY.L
BBY.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BBY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BBY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAP.MC vs. BBY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mapfre (MAP.MC) and Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAP.MCBBY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.44

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

5.32

-4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

21.54

-18.19

MAP.MC vs. BBY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAP.MC Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the BBY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAP.MC and BBY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAP.MCBBY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

2.60

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.03

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.49

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.18

+0.09

Drawdowns

MAP.MC vs. BBY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAP.MC drawdown since its inception was -64.93%, which is greater than BBY.L's maximum drawdown of -59.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAP.MC and BBY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAP.MCBBY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.93%

-59.58%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.85%

-11.19%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-20.34%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.76%

-29.58%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.32%

-42.21%

-12.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.15%

-5.77%

-2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.73%

-25.83%

+4.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.02%

2.77%

+3.25%

Volatility

MAP.MC vs. BBY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mapfre (MAP.MC) is 4.84%, while Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that MAP.MC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAP.MCBBY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

7.73%

-2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.21%

18.65%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.32%

22.85%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.11%

24.24%

-3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.17%

29.05%

-3.88%

Dividends

MAP.MC vs. BBY.L - Dividend Comparison

MAP.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than BBY.L's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBY.L
Balfour Beatty plc
1.73%1.81%2.59%3.17%2.81%1.72%0.00%2.03%1.60%1.01%1.08%0.00%
MAP.MC
Mapfre
3.77%3.19%5.16%6.08%6.54%6.12%6.93%5.02%5.10%4.40%3.65%4.86%

Financials

MAP.MC vs. BBY.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mapfre and Balfour Beatty plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. MAP.MC values in EUR, BBY.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


MAP.MC and BBY.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAP.MC and BBY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer