PortfoliosLab logo
MAP.MC vs. UNA.AS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MAP.MC and UNA.AS is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MAP.MC vs. UNA.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mapfre (MAP.MC) and Unilever PLC (UNA.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MAP.MC:

2.31

UNA.AS:

0.90

Sortino Ratio

MAP.MC:

3.06

UNA.AS:

1.23

Omega Ratio

MAP.MC:

1.43

UNA.AS:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

MAP.MC:

4.72

UNA.AS:

0.26

Martin Ratio

MAP.MC:

12.83

UNA.AS:

2.90

Ulcer Index

MAP.MC:

4.12%

UNA.AS:

5.32%

Daily Std Dev

MAP.MC:

22.72%

UNA.AS:

18.05%

Max Drawdown

MAP.MC:

-64.93%

UNA.AS:

-92.87%

Current Drawdown

MAP.MC:

0.00%

UNA.AS:

-52.89%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAP.MC:

€10.26B

UNA.AS:

€137.44B

EPS

MAP.MC:

€0.32

UNA.AS:

€2.29

PE Ratio

MAP.MC:

10.45

UNA.AS:

24.44

PS Ratio

MAP.MC:

0.35

UNA.AS:

2.26

PB Ratio

MAP.MC:

1.14

UNA.AS:

6.88

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAP.MC achieves a 36.84% return, which is significantly higher than UNA.AS's 2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MAP.MC has underperformed UNA.AS with an annualized return of 5.79%, while UNA.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 7.05% annualized return.


MAP.MC

YTD

36.84%

1M

28.22%

6M

32.27%

1Y

53.22%

5Y*

22.42%

10Y*

5.79%

UNA.AS

YTD

2.47%

1M

6.94%

6M

3.07%

1Y

16.41%

5Y*

7.99%

10Y*

7.05%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MAP.MC vs. UNA.AS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAP.MC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MAP.MC is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MAP.MC is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MAP.MC is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MAP.MC is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MAP.MC is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MAP.MC is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

UNA.AS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UNA.AS is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UNA.AS is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UNA.AS is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UNA.AS is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UNA.AS is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UNA.AS is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MAP.MC vs. UNA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mapfre (MAP.MC) and Unilever PLC (UNA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MAP.MC Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the UNA.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAP.MC and UNA.AS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MAP.MC vs. UNA.AS - Dividend Comparison

MAP.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than UNA.AS's 3.15% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MAP.MC
Mapfre
3.84%5.16%6.08%6.54%6.12%6.93%5.02%5.10%4.40%3.65%4.86%3.93%
UNA.AS
Unilever PLC
3.15%3.16%3.89%3.64%3.63%3.31%3.16%3.21%2.95%3.23%2.92%3.46%

Drawdowns

MAP.MC vs. UNA.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAP.MC drawdown since its inception was -64.93%, smaller than the maximum UNA.AS drawdown of -92.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAP.MC and UNA.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MAP.MC vs. UNA.AS - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

MAP.MC vs. UNA.AS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mapfre and Unilever PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024April
9.46B
29.05B
(MAP.MC) Total Revenue
(UNA.AS) Total Revenue
Values in EUR except per share items