PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MANKX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MANKX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund (MANKX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MANKX achieves a 2.51% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MANKX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 2.47%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.93% annualized return.


MANKX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.80%
YTD
2.51%
6M
2.85%
1Y
7.64%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
1.52%
10Y*
2.47%

FASGX

1D
0.24%
1M
2.29%
YTD
11.53%
6M
12.33%
1Y
25.08%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
9.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MANKX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MANKX
BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund
2.51%4.04%2.94%6.53%-9.01%5.31%0.23%7.24%1.00%6.95%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.53%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MANKX and FASGX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1991

0.03

The correlation between MANKX and FASGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MANKX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MANKX
MANKX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MANKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MANKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MANKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MANKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MANKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MANKX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund (MANKX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MANKXFASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.46

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

3.23

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

14.28

-5.41

MANKX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MANKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MANKX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MANKXFASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.48

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.67

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.79

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.63

+0.52

Drawdowns

MANKX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MANKX drawdown since its inception was -15.75%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANKX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MANKXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.75%

-47.35%

+31.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-7.95%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.66%

-12.80%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

-23.54%

+9.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.46%

-27.20%

+12.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.36%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-6.71%

+4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

1.80%

-0.94%

Volatility

MANKX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund (MANKX) is 1.16%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that MANKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MANKXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

3.31%

-2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

8.40%

-6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12%

10.35%

-7.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.53%

12.26%

-7.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.44%

12.65%

-8.21%

MANKX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MANKX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

MANKX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

MANKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than FASGX's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.58%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
MANKX
BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund
3.73%4.86%3.96%2.81%2.15%2.18%2.47%2.86%4.27%3.08%3.20%3.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


MANKX and FASGX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASGX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to MANKX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MANKX dropped -15.75% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MANKX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer