MANKX vs. DFSMX
MANKX (BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund) and DFSMX (DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, MANKX returned 2.38%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for DFSMX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MANKX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DFSMX.
Performance
MANKX vs. DFSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MANKX achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly higher than DFSMX's 1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, MANKX has outperformed DFSMX with an annualized return of 2.38%, while DFSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.26% annualized return.
MANKX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 2.71%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- 1Y
- 7.63%
- 3Y*
- 4.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.54%
- 10Y*
- 2.38%
DFSMX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 2.48%
- 3Y*
- 2.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.74%
- 10Y*
- 1.26%
MANKX vs. DFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MANKX BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund | 2.71% | 4.04% | 2.94% | 6.53% | -9.01% | 5.31% | 0.23% | 7.24% | 1.00% | 6.95% |
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 1.15% | 2.30% | 2.84% | 2.98% | -0.36% | -0.11% | 0.83% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between MANKX and DFSMX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2002 | 0.32 |
The correlation between MANKX and DFSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MANKX vs. DFSMX — Risk / Return Rank
MANKX
DFSMX
MANKX vs. DFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund (MANKX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MANKX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 4.46 | -2.86 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 12.85 | -10.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 76.73 | -67.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MANKX vs. DFSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MANKX drawdown since its inception was -15.75%, which is greater than DFSMX's maximum drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANKX and DFSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MANKX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.75% | -2.66% | -13.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -0.20% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.66% | -0.49% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.72% | -1.66% | -12.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.46% | -1.69% | -12.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -0.23% | -1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 0.03% | +0.83% |
Volatility
MANKX vs. DFSMX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund (MANKX) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) at 0.18%. This indicates that MANKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MANKX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 0.18% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.25% | 0.38% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.12% | 0.61% | +2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 0.79% | +3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.43% | 0.77% | +3.66% |
MANKX vs. DFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MANKX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSMX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
MANKX vs. DFSMX - Dividend Comparison
MANKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than DFSMX's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.35% | 2.08% | 2.80% | 1.94% | 0.63% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 0.95% | 0.94% | 0.95% |
MANKX BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund | 3.72% | 4.86% | 3.96% | 2.81% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.47% | 2.86% | 4.27% | 3.08% | 3.20% | 3.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MANKX and DFSMX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MANKX has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to DFSMX (0.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MANKX dropped -15.75% vs DFSMX's -2.66%.
DFSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MANKX and DFSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer