MANI vs. ABI
MANI (Man Active Income ETF) and ABI (VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MANI charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ABI.
Performance
MANI vs. ABI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MANI achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly higher than ABI's 3.02% return.
MANI
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 4.12%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABI
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MANI vs. ABI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 4.12% | 2.30% |
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF | 3.02% | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between MANI and ABI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MANI vs. ABI — Risk / Return Rank
MANI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ABI
MANI vs. ABI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active Income ETF (MANI) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MANI | ABI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.00 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.42 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MANI vs. ABI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MANI drawdown since its inception was -0.74%, smaller than the maximum ABI drawdown of -0.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANI and ABI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MANI | ABI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -0.95% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -0.18% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility
MANI vs. ABI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MANI | ABI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03% | 1.27% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 1.27% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 1.27% | +0.76% |
MANI vs. ABI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MANI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ABI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MANI vs. ABI - Dividend Comparison
MANI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than ABI's 5.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF | 5.68% | 3.01% |
MANI Man Active Income ETF | 4.69% | 3.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MANI and ABI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ABI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ABI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MANI.
ABI has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 4.69% for MANI.
They also come from different issuers: Man Group and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MANI and 0.65% for ABI.
Find the right allocation for MANI and ABI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer