PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGY vs. GIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGY vs. GIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGY achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than GIAX's 22.12% return.


MAGY

1D
-1.26%
1M
1.86%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
13.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GIAX

1D
-2.89%
1M
12.88%
YTD
22.12%
6M
19.89%
1Y
31.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGY vs. GIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAGY and GIAX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025

0.72

The correlation between MAGY and GIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGY vs. GIAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAGY
GIAX

Financial Services

99.9%
14.0%

Basic Materials

-

4.4%

Communication Services

-

14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.4%

Energy

-

1.3%

Healthcare

-

3.1%

Industrials

-

5.8%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Technology

-

36.5%

Utilities

-

4.0%

Financial Services

MAGY
99.9%
GIAX
14.0%

Basic Materials

MAGY

-

GIAX
4.4%

Communication Services

MAGY

-

GIAX
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

MAGY

-

GIAX
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

MAGY

-

GIAX
1.4%

Energy

MAGY

-

GIAX
1.3%

Healthcare

MAGY

-

GIAX
3.1%

Industrials

MAGY

-

GIAX
5.8%

Real Estate

MAGY

-

GIAX
2.9%

Technology

MAGY

-

GIAX
36.5%

Utilities

MAGY

-

GIAX
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGY vs. GIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGY
MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

GIAX
GIAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
GIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGY vs. GIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGYGIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

1.81

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

7.84

-4.73

MAGY vs. GIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the GIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGY and GIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGYGIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.47

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.97

+0.56

Drawdowns

MAGY vs. GIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum GIAX drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and GIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGYGIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-20.38%

+6.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.29%

-17.62%

+3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-2.89%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-2.99%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

4.07%

+0.22%

Volatility

MAGY vs. GIAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) is 3.67%, while Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that MAGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGYGIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

8.06%

-4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

19.80%

-8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.38%

21.77%

-7.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

21.46%

-6.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

21.46%

-6.89%

MAGY vs. GIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GIAX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGY vs. GIAX - Dividend Comparison

MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.35%, more than GIAX's 22.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GIAX
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF
22.33%25.62%10.58%
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
37.35%23.38%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGY and GIAX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIAX has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to MAGY (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGY dropped -14.29% vs GIAX's -20.38%.

On 1-year performance, GIAX leads with 31.82% vs 13.34% for MAGY. On fees, GIAX is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, MAGY has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GIAX has performed better with a 31.82% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GIAX is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.

MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 37.35%, compared with 22.33% for GIAX.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MAGY and 0.97% for GIAX.

GIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGY and GIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer