MAGY vs. GIAX
MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) and GIAX (Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGY returned 13.34% vs 31.82% for GIAX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAGY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for GIAX.
Performance
MAGY vs. GIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGY achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than GIAX's 22.12% return.
MAGY
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- -1.50%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIAX
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- 12.88%
- YTD
- 22.12%
- 6M
- 19.89%
- 1Y
- 31.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGY vs. GIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | -1.50% | 26.79% |
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 22.12% | 21.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGY and GIAX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025 | 0.72 |
The correlation between MAGY and GIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
MAGY vs. GIAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAGY
GIAX
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
MAGY
GIAX
Basic Materials
MAGY
-
GIAX
Communication Services
MAGY
-
GIAX
Consumer Cyclical
MAGY
-
GIAX
Consumer Defensive
MAGY
-
GIAX
Energy
MAGY
-
GIAX
Healthcare
MAGY
-
GIAX
Industrials
MAGY
-
GIAX
Real Estate
MAGY
-
GIAX
Technology
MAGY
-
GIAX
Utilities
MAGY
-
GIAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGY vs. GIAX — Risk / Return Rank
MAGY
GIAX
MAGY vs. GIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGY | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.27 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.81 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 7.84 | -4.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGY | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.47 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.97 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
MAGY vs. GIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum GIAX drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and GIAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGY | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -20.38% | +6.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.29% | -17.62% | +3.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | -2.89% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -2.99% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 4.07% | +0.22% |
Volatility
MAGY vs. GIAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) is 3.67%, while Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) has a volatility of 8.06%. This indicates that MAGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGY | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 8.06% | -4.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.29% | 19.80% | -8.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.38% | 21.77% | -7.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 21.46% | -6.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 21.46% | -6.89% |
MAGY vs. GIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GIAX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGY vs. GIAX - Dividend Comparison
MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.35%, more than GIAX's 22.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 22.33% | 25.62% | 10.58% |
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 37.35% | 23.38% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGY and GIAX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIAX has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to MAGY (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGY dropped -14.29% vs GIAX's -20.38%.
On 1-year performance, GIAX leads with 31.82% vs 13.34% for MAGY. On fees, GIAX is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, MAGY has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GIAX has performed better with a 31.82% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GIAX is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.
MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 37.35%, compared with 22.33% for GIAX.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MAGY and 0.97% for GIAX.
GIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGY and GIAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer