MAGY vs. MAGS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGY returned 1.42% vs 17.98% for MAGS. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MAGY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MAGS.

Performance

MAGY vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MAGY

• 1D: 2.29%
• 1M: 0.52%
• 6M: -7.69%
• YTD: -6.83%
• 1Y: 1.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.75%

MAGS

• 1D: 3.19%
• 1M: 1.32%
• 6M: -0.29%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 17.98%
• 3Y*: 28.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	$254.73M	$303.60M	$278.63M
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	$1.76M	$2.00M	$2.81M

MAGY vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	-6.83%	26.42%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	0.00%	57.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGY and MAGS is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.89

The correlation between MAGY and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGY vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAGY	MAGS
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	6.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	13.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MAGY vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAGY

MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 10
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 10
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 10

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 27
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAGY vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGY	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	0.64	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.04	1.01	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.12	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	0.77	-0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.16	2.26	-2.42

MAGY vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGY and MAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAGY vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGY	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.29%	-29.91%	+15.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.29%	-18.62%	+4.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.86%	-7.02%	-1.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.41%	-4.86%	+1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.53%	6.31%	-0.78%

Volatility

MAGY vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) is 6.83%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that MAGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGY	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.83%	8.02%	-1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.10%	17.37%	-3.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.87%	22.30%	-5.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.18%	26.09%	-9.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.18%	26.09%	-9.91%

MAGY vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGY vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.90%, more than MAGS's 1.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.48%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	38.99%	23.38%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGY and MAGS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, MAGY and MAGS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MAGY or MAGS?

MAGS has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to MAGY (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGY dropped -14.29% vs MAGS's -29.91%.

Which ETF is better, MAGY or MAGS?

On 1-year performance, MAGS leads with 17.98% vs 1.42% for MAGY. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, MAGY has been the lower-risk option at 6.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGY or MAGS?

Over the 1-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 17.98% return vs 1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGY or MAGS?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGY or MAGS?

MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 38.99%, compared with 1.48% for MAGS.

What is the main difference between MAGY and MAGS?

MAGY is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGS is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MAGY and 0.30% for MAGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.