MAGY vs. MSTY
MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGY returned 3.72% vs -73.76% for MSTY. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MAGY vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGY achieves a -5.47% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -35.55% return.
MAGY
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -5.47%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- -23.27%
- 6M
- -39.01%
- YTD
- -35.55%
- 1Y
- -73.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGY vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | -5.47% | 26.42% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -35.55% | -49.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGY and MSTY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGY vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
MAGY
MSTY
MAGY vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.75 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | -0.95 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.74 | -1.41 | +2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGY vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -77.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -77.40% | +63.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.29% | -77.40% | +63.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.53% | -74.66% | +67.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.14% | -28.01% | +24.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 52.19% | -47.14% |
Volatility
MAGY vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) is 6.10%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 23.76%. This indicates that MAGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGY | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 23.76% | -17.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.18% | 53.06% | -39.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 64.61% | -48.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 72.32% | -56.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 72.32% | -56.79% |
MAGY vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MAGY and MSTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MAGY vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.95%, less than MSTY's 289.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 38.95% | 23.38% | 0.00% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 289.43% | 294.61% | 104.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGY and MSTY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (23.76%) compared to MAGY (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGY dropped -14.29% vs MSTY's -77.40%.
On 1-year performance, MAGY leads with 3.72% vs -73.76% for MSTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, MAGY has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MAGY has performed better with a 3.72% return vs -73.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGY and MSTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 289.43%, compared with 38.95% for MAGY.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.
MAGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGY and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer