PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGY vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGY vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGY achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 1.90% return.


MAGY

1D
-1.26%
1M
1.86%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
13.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGY vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAGY and BUCK is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025

0.02

MAGY vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAGY
BUCK

Financial Services

99.9%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

MAGY
99.9%
BUCK
100.0%

Basic Materials

MAGY

-

BUCK

-

Communication Services

MAGY

-

BUCK

-

Consumer Cyclical

MAGY

-

BUCK

-

Consumer Defensive

MAGY

-

BUCK

-

Energy

MAGY

-

BUCK

-

Healthcare

MAGY

-

BUCK

-

Industrials

MAGY

-

BUCK

-

Real Estate

MAGY

-

BUCK

-

Technology

MAGY

-

BUCK

-

Utilities

MAGY

-

BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGY vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGY
MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGY vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGYBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.54

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

6.11

-5.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

32.31

-29.20

MAGY vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGY and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGYBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

2.54

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

1.47

+0.06

Drawdowns

MAGY vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGYBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-5.43%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.29%

-1.31%

-12.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-0.04%

-3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-0.49%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

0.25%

+4.04%

Volatility

MAGY vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that MAGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGYBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

0.70%

+2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

1.53%

+9.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.38%

3.14%

+11.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

3.49%

+11.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

3.49%

+11.08%

MAGY vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGY vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.35%, more than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
37.35%23.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGY and BUCK have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAGY has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGY dropped -14.29% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, MAGY leads with 13.34% vs 7.95% for BUCK. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAGY has performed better with a 13.34% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.

MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 37.35%, compared with 7.42% for BUCK.

MAGY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MAGY and 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGY and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer