PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGY vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGY vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGY achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 192.40% return.


MAGY

1D
-1.26%
1M
1.86%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
13.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
4.91%
1M
72.80%
YTD
192.40%
6M
186.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGY vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAGY and AMDW is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.42

MAGY vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAGY
AMDW

Financial Services

99.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

28.6%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

MAGY
99.9%
AMDW

-

Basic Materials

MAGY

-

AMDW

-

Communication Services

MAGY

-

AMDW

-

Consumer Cyclical

MAGY

-

AMDW

-

Consumer Defensive

MAGY

-

AMDW

-

Energy

MAGY

-

AMDW

-

Healthcare

MAGY

-

AMDW

-

Industrials

MAGY

-

AMDW

-

Real Estate

MAGY

-

AMDW

-

Technology

MAGY

-

AMDW
28.6%

Utilities

MAGY

-

AMDW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGY vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGY
MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGY vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGYAMDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

MAGY vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGYAMDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

4.83

-3.30

Drawdowns

MAGY vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGYAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-34.64%

+20.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

0.00%

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-14.66%

+11.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

Volatility

MAGY vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGYAMDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.38%

81.56%

-67.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

81.56%

-66.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

81.56%

-66.99%

MAGY vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MAGY and AMDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

MAGY vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.35%, more than AMDW's 28.98% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MAGY and AMDW have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAGY and AMDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 37.35%, compared with 28.98% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGY and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer