PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGS vs. SPDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGS vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 12.18% return.


MAGS

1D
0.03%
1M
-4.44%
YTD
0.86%
6M
0.73%
1Y
28.10%
3Y*
33.16%
5Y*
10Y*

SPDW

1D
0.99%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
12.18%
6M
14.96%
1Y
27.89%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGS vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
0.86%22.99%63.97%37.32%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
12.18%34.75%3.55%8.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGS and SPDW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2023

0.52

The correlation between MAGS and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGS vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAGS
SPDW

Technology

15.3%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
7.8%

Communication Services

9.1%
3.8%

Basic Materials

-

7.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.7%

Energy

-

5.5%

Financial Services

-

22.9%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Industrials

-

19.2%

Real Estate

-

2.5%

Utilities

-

3.3%

Technology

MAGS
15.3%
SPDW
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MAGS
10.3%
SPDW
7.8%

Communication Services

MAGS
9.1%
SPDW
3.8%

Basic Materials

MAGS

-

SPDW
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

MAGS

-

SPDW
5.7%

Energy

MAGS

-

SPDW
5.5%

Financial Services

MAGS

-

SPDW
22.9%

Healthcare

MAGS

-

SPDW
8.3%

Industrials

MAGS

-

SPDW
19.2%

Real Estate

MAGS

-

SPDW
2.5%

Utilities

MAGS

-

SPDW
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGS vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGS vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGSSPDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.43

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.22

9.42

-4.20

MAGS vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGS and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGSSPDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.74

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

0.23

+1.26

Drawdowns

MAGS vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and SPDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGSSPDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.91%

-60.02%

+30.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.62%

-11.55%

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.91%

-13.53%

-16.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.22%

-3.30%

-2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-12.90%

+8.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.40%

2.97%

+2.43%

Volatility

MAGS vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) have volatilities of 5.89% and 6.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGSSPDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

6.07%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.84%

13.76%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.22%

16.09%

+4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.99%

16.58%

+9.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.99%

17.30%

+8.69%

MAGS vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGS vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than SPDW's 2.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.47%1.48%0.81%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.94%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGS and SPDW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPDW has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to MAGS (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 33.16% vs 18.62% for SPDW. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 33.16% return vs 18.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for MAGS.

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 1.47% for MAGS.

MAGS is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPDW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for MAGS and 0.04% for SPDW.

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGS and SPDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer