MAGS vs. GINN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. MAGS is actively managed, while GINN is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAGS returned 29.20%/yr vs 18.28%/yr for GINN. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAGS charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.

Performance

MAGS vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than GINN's 5.00% return.

MAGS

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -8.97%
• YTD: -4.28%
• 6M: -5.96%
• 1Y: 18.84%
• 3Y*: 29.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GINN

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 3.65%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 5.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGS vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	-4.28%	22.99%	63.97%	35.74%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	5.00%	20.25%	18.71%	15.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGS and GINN is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023	0.73

The correlation between MAGS and GINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGS vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAGS	GINN
Technology	8.1%	32.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	12.7%
Communication Services	4.0%	10.7%
Basic Materials	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.8%
Energy	-	1.7%
Financial Services	-	12.4%
Healthcare	-	20.6%
Industrials	-	4.7%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Utilities	-	1.7%

Return for Risk

MAGS vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 25
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 26

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 35
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGS vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGS	GINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	1.22	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	1.75	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.22	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	1.54	-0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.34	5.39	-2.05

MAGS vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGS and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAGS vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and GINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGS	GINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.91%	-41.25%	+11.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.62%	-13.18%	-5.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.91%	-22.25%	-7.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.00%	-4.93%	-6.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-13.28%	+8.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.65%	3.75%	+1.90%

Volatility

MAGS vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 5.81%. This indicates that MAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGS	GINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.13%	5.81%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.51%	12.92%	+2.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.74%	16.57%	+4.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.02%	21.44%	+4.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.02%	21.07%	+4.95%

MAGS vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGS vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than GINN's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.20%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.55%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGS and GINN in my portfolio?

MAGS and GINN have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGS or GINN?

MAGS has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to GINN (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs GINN's -41.25%.

Which ETF is better, MAGS or GINN?

On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 29.20% vs 18.28% for GINN. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGS or GINN?

Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 29.20% return vs 18.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGS or GINN?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGS or GINN?

MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 1.20% for GINN.

What is the main difference between MAGS and GINN?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for MAGS and 0.50% for GINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.