MAGS vs. AAPY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY).

MAGS and AAPY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAGS is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Apr 10, 2023. AAPY is an actively managed fund by Kurv. It was launched on Oct 26, 2023.

Performance

MAGS vs. AAPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MAGS vs. AAPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	-12.16%	22.99%	63.97%	17.75%
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF	-8.31%	5.04%	20.54%	9.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a -12.16% return, which is significantly lower than AAPY's -8.31% return.

MAGS

• 1D: 4.60%
• 1M: -5.56%
• YTD: -12.16%
• 6M: -9.36%
• 1Y: 28.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAPY

• 1D: 3.36%
• 1M: -4.71%
• YTD: -8.31%
• 6M: -1.70%
• 1Y: 7.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGS vs. AAPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AAPY's 0.99% expense ratio.

AAPY

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

MAGS

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF

Return for Risk

MAGS vs. AAPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 62
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 58

AAPY

AAPY Risk / Return Rank: 22
AAPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
AAPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
AAPY Omega Ratio Rank: 23
AAPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
AAPY Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGS vs. AAPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAGS	AAPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	0.28	+0.71
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	0.59	+1.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.09	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	0.47	+1.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.25	1.43	+3.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAGS vs. AAPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the AAPY Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGS and AAPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAGS	AAPY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	0.28	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.34	0.47	+0.87

Correlation

The correlation between MAGS and AAPY is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MAGS vs. AAPY - Dividend Comparison

MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than AAPY's 13.59% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.68%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%
AAPY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF	13.59%	12.66%	17.15%	2.16%

Drawdowns

MAGS vs. AAPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, roughly equal to the maximum AAPY drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and AAPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGS	AAPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.91%	-29.22%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.62%	-19.80%	+1.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.87%	-11.59%	-3.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-6.52%	+1.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.29%	6.46%	-1.17%

Volatility

MAGS vs. AAPY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF (AAPY) at 6.56%. This indicates that MAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGS	AAPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.36%	6.56%	+1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.45%	15.36%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.68%	27.07%	+1.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.29%	22.27%	+4.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.29%	22.27%	+4.02%