PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGG vs. CVRD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGG vs. CVRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) and Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGG achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than CVRD's -0.75% return.


MAGG

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.51%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CVRD

1D
-0.36%
1M
-3.96%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
-0.53%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGG vs. CVRD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MAGG
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF
0.25%7.28%1.81%4.39%
CVRD
Madison Covered Call ETF
-0.75%5.94%4.90%4.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGG and CVRD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGG vs. CVRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGG
MAGG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MAGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

CVRD
CVRD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CVRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVRD Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CVRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVRD Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGG vs. CVRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) and Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAGGCVRDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.10

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

0.92

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.83

2.77

+2.06

MAGG vs. CVRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the CVRD Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGG and CVRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAGG vs. CVRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGG drawdown since its inception was -4.56%, smaller than the maximum CVRD drawdown of -17.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGG and CVRD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGGCVRDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-17.95%

+13.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-5.72%

+2.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-4.90%

+3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-2.01%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

1.91%

-0.93%

Volatility

MAGG vs. CVRD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) is 0.87%, while Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that MAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGGCVRDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

2.74%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

7.11%

-4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95%

9.66%

-5.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.73%

11.79%

-7.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

11.79%

-7.06%

MAGG vs. CVRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CVRD's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGG vs. CVRD - Dividend Comparison

MAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, less than CVRD's 7.81% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CVRD
Madison Covered Call ETF
7.81%7.63%15.70%1.50%
MAGG
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF
4.73%4.80%5.13%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGG and CVRD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVRD has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to MAGG (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGG dropped -4.56% vs CVRD's -17.95%.

On 1-year performance, CVRD leads with 5.27% vs 4.71% for MAGG. On fees, MAGG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, MAGG has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CVRD has performed better with a 5.27% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAGG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CVRD.

CVRD has the higher dividend yield at 7.81%, compared with 4.73% for MAGG.

MAGG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while CVRD is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MAGG and 0.90% for CVRD.

MAGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGG and CVRD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer