PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGG vs. DIVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGG vs. DIVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) and Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGG achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than DIVL's 7.97% return.


MAGG

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.51%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIVL

1D
0.65%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
7.97%
6M
7.23%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGG vs. DIVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MAGG
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF
0.25%7.28%1.81%4.39%
DIVL
Madison Dividend Value ETF
7.97%9.83%8.81%2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGG and DIVL is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGG vs. DIVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGG
MAGG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MAGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVL
DIVL Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGG vs. DIVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) and Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAGGDIVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.10

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.83

6.07

-1.24

MAGG vs. DIVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the DIVL Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGG and DIVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAGG vs. DIVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGG drawdown since its inception was -4.56%, smaller than the maximum DIVL drawdown of -14.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGG and DIVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGGDIVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-14.06%

+9.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-6.93%

+4.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-3.51%

+2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-2.58%

+1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

2.40%

-1.42%

Volatility

MAGG vs. DIVL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) is 0.87%, while Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that MAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGGDIVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

3.01%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

7.92%

-5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95%

10.71%

-6.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.73%

12.36%

-7.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

12.36%

-7.63%

MAGG vs. DIVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVL's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGG vs. DIVL - Dividend Comparison

MAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than DIVL's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DIVL
Madison Dividend Value ETF
1.77%1.80%2.19%1.01%
MAGG
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF
4.73%4.80%5.13%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGG and DIVL have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVL has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to MAGG (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGG dropped -4.56% vs DIVL's -14.06%.

On 1-year performance, DIVL leads with 14.51% vs 4.71% for MAGG. On fees, MAGG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, MAGG has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVL has performed better with a 14.51% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAGG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVL.

MAGG has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 1.77% for DIVL.

MAGG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while DIVL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MAGG and 0.65% for DIVL.

DIVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGG and DIVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer