MAGG vs. PIFI
MAGG (Madison Aggregate Bond ETF) and PIFI (ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGG returned 4.71% vs 2.97% for PIFI. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MAGG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PIFI.
Performance
MAGG vs. PIFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGG achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than PIFI's -0.18% return.
MAGG
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIFI
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.05%
- 10Y*
- —
MAGG vs. PIFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGG Madison Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.25% | 7.28% | 1.81% | 4.39% |
PIFI ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF | -0.18% | 6.29% | 2.52% | 3.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGG and PIFI is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023 | 0.85 |
The correlation between MAGG and PIFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGG vs. PIFI — Risk / Return Rank
MAGG
PIFI
MAGG vs. PIFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) and ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF (PIFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGG | PIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.20 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 1.55 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.83 | 4.11 | +0.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGG vs. PIFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGG drawdown since its inception was -4.56%, smaller than the maximum PIFI drawdown of -10.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGG and PIFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGG | PIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.56% | -10.59% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | -1.93% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -1.49% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -3.21% | +1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.73% | +0.25% |
Volatility
MAGG vs. PIFI - Volatility Comparison
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) has a higher volatility of 0.87% compared to ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF (PIFI) at 0.82%. This indicates that MAGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGG | PIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 0.82% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.66% | 1.93% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.95% | 2.62% | +1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.73% | 3.68% | +1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.73% | 3.48% | +1.25% |
MAGG vs. PIFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PIFI's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGG vs. PIFI - Dividend Comparison
MAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than PIFI's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGG Madison Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.73% | 4.80% | 5.13% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIFI ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF | 3.76% | 3.16% | 2.92% | 2.29% | 1.22% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGG and PIFI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGG has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to PIFI (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGG dropped -4.56% vs PIFI's -10.59%.
On 1-year performance, MAGG leads with 4.71% vs 2.97% for PIFI. On fees, MAGG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MAGG has performed better with a 4.71% return vs 2.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PIFI.
MAGG has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 3.76% for PIFI.
They also come from different issuers: Madison and ClearShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MAGG and 0.45% for PIFI.
MAGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGG and PIFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer