MAGC vs. PLTW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MAGC (Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGC is a China Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGC returned -19.72% vs -18.28% for PLTW. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAGC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.

Performance

MAGC vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGC achieves a -20.52% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -34.45% return.

MAGC

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 0.91%
• 6M: -24.55%
• YTD: -20.52%
• 1Y: -19.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTW

• 1D: 2.60%
• 1M: 1.25%
• 6M: -34.83%
• YTD: -34.45%
• 1Y: -18.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGC vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	-20.52%	-7.66%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-34.45%	28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGC and PLTW is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.23

Return for Risk

MAGC vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGC

MAGC Risk / Return Rank: 4
MAGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MAGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
MAGC Omega Ratio Rank: 4
MAGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
MAGC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 7
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 8
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGC vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGC	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	-0.30	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.96	-0.02	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.00	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	-0.32	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.96	-0.62	-0.34

MAGC vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGC Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGC and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAGC vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGC drawdown since its inception was -41.99%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGC and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGC	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.99%	-57.27%	+15.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.99%	-57.27%	+15.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.21%	-46.39%	+13.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.35%	-24.32%	+7.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.63%	29.45%	-8.82%

Volatility

MAGC vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) is 8.57%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 19.83%. This indicates that MAGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGC	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.57%	19.83%	-11.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.58%	47.88%	-27.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.35%	61.99%	-34.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.02%	74.06%	-40.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.02%	74.06%	-40.04%

MAGC vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGC vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than PLTW's 135.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF	5.16%	4.10%	1.02%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	135.06%	72.40%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGC and PLTW in my portfolio?

MAGC and PLTW have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGC or PLTW?

PLTW has higher volatility (19.83%) compared to MAGC (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGC dropped -41.99% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

Which ETF is better, MAGC or PLTW?

On 1-year performance, PLTW leads with -18.28% vs -19.72% for MAGC. On fees, MAGC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, MAGC has been the lower-risk option at 8.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGC or PLTW?

Over the 1-year period, PLTW has performed better with a -18.28% return vs -19.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGC or PLTW?

MAGC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGC or PLTW?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 135.06%, compared with 5.16% for MAGC.

What is the main difference between MAGC and PLTW?

MAGC is categorized as China Equities, while PLTW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MAGC and 0.99% for PLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.30 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.