MAGA vs. SCHX
MAGA (Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MAGA tracks the Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker Index while SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MAGA returned 9.20%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for SCHX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAGA charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
MAGA vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGA achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 10.72% return.
MAGA
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 6M
- 4.95%
- 1Y
- 12.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
MAGA vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF | 5.76% | 10.31% | 14.69% | 10.37% | -1.01% | 33.60% | 5.93% | 26.08% | -14.82% | 12.12% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.72% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 9.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGA and SCHX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2017 | 0.77 |
The correlation between MAGA and SCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MAGA vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAGA
SCHX
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Industrials
MAGA
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
MAGA
SCHX
Energy
MAGA
SCHX
Basic Materials
MAGA
SCHX
Utilities
MAGA
SCHX
Financial Services
MAGA
SCHX
Healthcare
MAGA
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
MAGA
SCHX
Technology
MAGA
SCHX
Real Estate
MAGA
SCHX
Communication Services
MAGA
-
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGA vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
MAGA
SCHX
MAGA vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGA | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 2.29 | -1.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 3.14 | -1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.41 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 3.05 | -1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | 13.85 | -8.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGA | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 2.29 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.78 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.85 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
MAGA vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGA | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.17% | -34.33% | -8.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.02% | -9.02% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.80% | -19.04% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.02% | -25.41% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -0.70% | -2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -3.97% | -1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 1.98% | +0.28% |
Volatility
MAGA vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) is 2.64%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that MAGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGA | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 2.91% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.96% | 9.02% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.19% | 11.99% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 17.12% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 18.15% | +2.15% |
MAGA vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGA has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGA vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than SCHX's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.18% | 1.60% | 1.33% | 0.69% | 2.59% | 2.19% | 2.14% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGA and SCHX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to MAGA (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGA dropped -43.17% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 13.29% vs 9.20% for MAGA. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MAGA has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 13.29% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for MAGA.
MAGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 1.01% for SCHX.
MAGA tracks Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Point Bridge Capital and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for MAGA and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGA and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer