PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGA vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGA vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGA achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 11.28% return.


MAGA

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
5.76%
6M
4.95%
1Y
12.22%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*

SCHB

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.28%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGA vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MAGA
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
5.76%10.31%14.69%10.37%-1.01%33.60%5.93%26.08%-14.82%12.12%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
11.28%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%9.35%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGA and SCHB is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2017

0.79

The correlation between MAGA and SCHB shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MAGA vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAGA
SCHB

Industrials

22.4%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

16.5%
10.1%

Energy

14.0%
3.7%

Basic Materials

10.4%
2.0%

Utilities

9.8%
2.3%

Financial Services

8.5%
12.2%

Healthcare

6.8%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.6%

Technology

3.0%
34.4%

Real Estate

2.8%
2.4%

Communication Services

-

10.1%

Industrials

MAGA
22.4%
SCHB
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

MAGA
16.5%
SCHB
10.1%

Energy

MAGA
14.0%
SCHB
3.7%

Basic Materials

MAGA
10.4%
SCHB
2.0%

Utilities

MAGA
9.8%
SCHB
2.3%

Financial Services

MAGA
8.5%
SCHB
12.2%

Healthcare

MAGA
6.8%
SCHB
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

MAGA
4.9%
SCHB
4.6%

Technology

MAGA
3.0%
SCHB
34.4%

Real Estate

MAGA
2.8%
SCHB
2.4%

Communication Services

MAGA

-

SCHB
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGA vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGA
MAGA Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MAGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGA Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGA Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGA vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGASCHBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

2.33

-1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

3.19

-1.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.42

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.17

-1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.42

14.55

-9.12

MAGA vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGA Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGA and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGASCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

2.33

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.74

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.83

-0.29

Drawdowns

MAGA vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGASCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.17%

-35.27%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-8.91%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.80%

-19.34%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.02%

-25.41%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.32%

-0.72%

-2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-4.12%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

1.94%

+0.32%

Volatility

MAGA vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) is 2.64%, while Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that MAGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGASCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

3.01%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.96%

9.14%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

12.12%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

17.24%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.30%

18.32%

+1.98%

MAGA vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGA has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGA vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than SCHB's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAGA
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
1.52%1.61%1.18%1.60%1.33%0.69%2.59%2.19%2.14%0.43%0.00%0.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGA and SCHB have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHB has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to MAGA (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGA dropped -43.17% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 5-year performance, SCHB leads with 12.76% vs 9.20% for MAGA. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MAGA has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for MAGA.

MAGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 1.02% for SCHB.

MAGA tracks Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Point Bridge Capital and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for MAGA and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGA and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer