PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGA vs. JUST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGA vs. JUST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGA achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly lower than JUST's 11.64% return.


MAGA

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
5.76%
6M
4.95%
1Y
12.22%
3Y*
15.10%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*

JUST

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.90%
YTD
11.64%
6M
11.94%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGA vs. JUST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MAGA
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
5.76%10.31%14.69%10.37%-1.01%33.60%5.93%26.08%-15.10%
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
11.64%17.60%23.73%24.86%-17.88%26.89%19.59%31.54%-9.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGA and JUST is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018

0.77

The correlation between MAGA and JUST shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MAGA vs. JUST - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAGA
JUST

Industrials

22.4%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

16.5%
9.8%

Energy

14.0%
3.6%

Basic Materials

10.4%
2.2%

Utilities

9.8%
2.2%

Financial Services

8.5%
12.5%

Healthcare

6.8%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.5%

Technology

3.0%
35.8%

Real Estate

2.8%
2.2%

Communication Services

-

9.3%

Industrials

MAGA
22.4%
JUST
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MAGA
16.5%
JUST
9.8%

Energy

MAGA
14.0%
JUST
3.6%

Basic Materials

MAGA
10.4%
JUST
2.2%

Utilities

MAGA
9.8%
JUST
2.2%

Financial Services

MAGA
8.5%
JUST
12.5%

Healthcare

MAGA
6.8%
JUST
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

MAGA
4.9%
JUST
5.5%

Technology

MAGA
3.0%
JUST
35.8%

Real Estate

MAGA
2.8%
JUST
2.2%

Communication Services

MAGA

-

JUST
9.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGA vs. JUST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGA
MAGA Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MAGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGA Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGA Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

JUST
JUST Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JUST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUST Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUST Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JUST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUST Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGA vs. JUST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGAJUSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.44

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.33

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

15.48

-10.06

MAGA vs. JUST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGA Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the JUST Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGA and JUST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGAJUSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

2.46

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.79

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.78

-0.23

Drawdowns

MAGA vs. JUST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than JUST's maximum drawdown of -33.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and JUST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGAJUSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.17%

-33.83%

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-8.76%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.80%

-19.34%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.02%

-24.72%

+6.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.32%

-0.74%

-2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-5.10%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

1.88%

+0.38%

Volatility

MAGA vs. JUST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) is 2.64%, while Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that MAGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JUST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGAJUSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

2.94%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.96%

9.09%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

11.88%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

16.78%

-0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.30%

19.12%

+1.18%

MAGA vs. JUST - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGA has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than JUST's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGA vs. JUST - Dividend Comparison

MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than JUST's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.93%1.02%1.11%1.37%1.51%1.07%1.36%1.86%1.11%0.00%
MAGA
Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF
1.52%1.61%1.18%1.60%1.33%0.69%2.59%2.19%2.14%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGA and JUST have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JUST has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to MAGA (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGA dropped -43.17% vs JUST's -33.83%.

On 5-year performance, JUST leads with 13.24% vs 9.20% for MAGA. On fees, JUST is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MAGA has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JUST has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JUST is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for MAGA.

MAGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.93% for JUST.

MAGA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while JUST is Large Cap Growth Equities. MAGA tracks Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker Index, while JUST tracks JUST US Large Cap Diversified Index. They also come from different issuers: Point Bridge Capital and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for MAGA and 0.20% for JUST.

JUST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGA and JUST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer