MAGA vs. BUFX
MAGA (Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker Index, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAGA charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
MAGA vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGA achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.10% return.
MAGA
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 6M
- 4.95%
- 1Y
- 12.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.20%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGA vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF | 5.76% | 5.62% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.10% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGA and BUFX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGA vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
MAGA
BUFX
MAGA vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF (MAGA) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGA | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGA | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 2.68 | -2.14 |
Drawdowns
MAGA vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGA drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGA and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGA | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.17% | -2.87% | -40.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -0.07% | -3.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.73% | -0.24% | -5.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | — | — |
Volatility
MAGA vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGA | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.19% | 3.98% | +7.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 3.98% | +12.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 3.98% | +16.32% |
MAGA vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGA has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGA vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
MAGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGA Point Bridge GOP Stock Tracker ETF | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.18% | 1.60% | 1.33% | 0.69% | 2.59% | 2.19% | 2.14% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGA and BUFX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGA is cheaper at 0.72% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGA is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
MAGA has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
MAGA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Point Bridge Capital and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for MAGA and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for MAGA and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer