MAEGX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund (MAEGX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
MAEGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Nov 3, 2005. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
MAEGX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MAEGX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAEGX BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund | -4.78% | 12.30% | 7.62% | 33.37% | -20.23% | 20.72% | 21.90% | 32.76% | -4.54% | 24.80% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAEGX achieves a -4.78% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MAEGX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 10.96%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.
MAEGX
- 1D
- 3.96%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -4.78%
- 6M
- -4.47%
- 1Y
- 13.95%
- 3Y*
- 9.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MAEGX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAEGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MAEGX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
MAEGX
FGIAX
MAEGX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund (MAEGX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAEGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 1.79 | -1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 2.30 | -1.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.36 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 2.73 | -1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.34 | 12.62 | -8.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAEGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.79 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.80 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.42 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between MAEGX and FGIAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MAEGX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
MAEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAEGX BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.13% | 22.75% | 10.44% | 12.01% | 8.53% | 4.06% | 0.93% | 8.22% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
MAEGX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAEGX drawdown since its inception was -48.71%, roughly equal to the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAEGX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAEGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.71% | -49.35% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.69% | -8.29% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.26% | -21.08% | -10.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.93% | -38.02% | +6.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.23% | -3.06% | -6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -7.22% | -0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 1.79% | +1.54% |
Volatility
MAEGX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Unconstrained Equity Fund (MAEGX) has a higher volatility of 8.18% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that MAEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MAEGX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.18% | 4.15% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.25% | 7.07% | +6.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.15% | 12.28% | +9.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 13.08% | +7.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 15.17% | +3.67% |