PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAAY vs. FBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAAY vs. FBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF (MAAY) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAAY achieves a -15.55% return, which is significantly higher than FBL's -19.72% return.


MAAY

1D
0.13%
1M
4.35%
YTD
-15.55%
6M
-31.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBL

1D
8.48%
1M
2.55%
YTD
-19.72%
6M
-15.34%
1Y
-29.78%
3Y*
33.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAAY vs. FBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MAAY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF
-15.55%-27.95%
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
-19.72%7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MAAY and FBL is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAAY vs. FBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAAY

FBL
FBL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAAY vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF (MAAY) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MAAY vs. FBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAAYFBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.93

1.12

-3.05

Drawdowns

MAAY vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAAY drawdown since its inception was -45.22%, smaller than the maximum FBL drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAAY and FBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAAYFBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.22%

-61.15%

+15.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.90%

-47.97%

+8.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.44%

-16.41%

-15.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.76%

Volatility

MAAY vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAAYFBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.16%

70.42%

-40.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.16%

71.06%

-40.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.16%

71.06%

-40.90%

MAAY vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAAY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FBL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAAY vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison

MAAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 131.86%, more than FBL's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
2.58%2.07%0.00%51.58%
MAAY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST MARA ETF
131.86%31.22%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAAY and FBL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MAAY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAAY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for FBL.

MAAY has the higher dividend yield at 131.86%, compared with 2.58% for FBL.

MAAY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FBL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MAAY and 1.15% for FBL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAAY and FBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer