PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MA vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MA vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a -8.19% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MA has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 20.09%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.34% annualized return.


MA

1D
1.72%
1M
5.49%
YTD
-8.19%
6M
-8.19%
1Y
-6.92%
3Y*
10.57%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
20.09%

VGT

1D
-1.92%
1M
-5.50%
YTD
24.69%
6M
24.69%
1Y
43.49%
3Y*
29.21%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*
25.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MA vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
-8.19%9.04%24.17%23.40%-2.66%1.16%20.19%59.16%25.31%47.69%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.69%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between MA and VGT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2006

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between MA and VGT has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MA vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MA
MA Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MA vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.32

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

2.66

-3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.64

7.95

-8.59

MA vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MA Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MA and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MA vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.67%

-54.63%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.91%

-16.40%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-27.23%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.25%

-35.07%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.00%

-35.07%

-5.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.38%

-6.69%

-5.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-7.95%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.91%

5.48%

+5.43%

Volatility

MA vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is 7.53%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that MA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

11.38%

-3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.52%

18.95%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.29%

23.00%

-1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.04%

25.62%

-1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.86%

24.77%

+2.09%

Dividends

MA vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than VGT's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
0.62%0.53%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.37%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


MA and VGT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to MA (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MA dropped -62.67% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MA and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer