PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MA vs. PDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MA vs. PDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a -13.89% return, which is significantly lower than PDO's -1.72% return.


MA

1D
0.71%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
-13.89%
6M
-14.05%
1Y
-16.36%
3Y*
10.32%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
18.64%

PDO

1D
0.78%
1M
1.23%
YTD
-1.72%
6M
-1.43%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MA vs. PDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
-13.89%9.04%24.17%23.40%-2.66%10.05%
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
-1.72%13.96%24.55%8.06%-23.40%5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MA and PDO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021

0.24

The correlation between MA and PDO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MA vs. PDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MA
MA Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

PDO
PDO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MA vs. PDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAPDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.16

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

0.66

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.59

2.29

-3.87

MA vs. PDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MA Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the PDO Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MA and PDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MA vs. PDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, which is greater than PDO's maximum drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and PDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAPDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.67%

-36.83%

-25.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.91%

-11.18%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-16.55%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.25%

-36.83%

+8.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.82%

-5.54%

-12.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-14.37%

+4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.48%

3.20%

+7.28%

Volatility

MA vs. PDO - Volatility Comparison

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) at 3.68%. This indicates that MA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAPDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

3.68%

+2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.51%

9.06%

+8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.34%

10.08%

+12.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.01%

15.80%

+8.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.92%

15.54%

+11.38%

Dividends

MA vs. PDO - Dividend Comparison

MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than PDO's 11.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
0.67%0.53%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
11.94%11.09%11.29%12.54%19.09%8.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MA vs. PDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mastercard Incorporated and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B20222023202420252026
8.40B
(MA) Total Revenue
(PDO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MA and PDO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MA has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to PDO (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MA dropped -62.67% vs PDO's -36.83%.

PDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MA and PDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer