MA vs. HCC
MA (Mastercard Incorporated) and HCC (Warrior Met Coal, Inc.) are both stocks. MA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while HCC operates in Coking Coal (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, MA returned 6.67%/yr vs 41.77%/yr for HCC. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MA vs. HCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a -13.70% return, which is significantly lower than HCC's 13.53% return.
MA
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- -13.70%
- 6M
- -9.69%
- 1Y
- -15.62%
- 3Y*
- 9.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 18.35%
HCC
- 1D
- -5.67%
- 1M
- 14.14%
- YTD
- 13.53%
- 6M
- 22.66%
- 1Y
- 115.36%
- 3Y*
- 42.50%
- 5Y*
- 41.77%
- 10Y*
- —
MA vs. HCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MA Mastercard Incorporated | -13.70% | 9.04% | 24.17% | 23.40% | -2.66% | 1.16% | 20.19% | 59.16% | 25.31% | 36.55% |
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc. | 13.53% | 63.49% | -9.79% | 81.59% | 41.03% | 21.82% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 23.20% | 125.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between MA and HCC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2017 | 0.20 |
The correlation between MA and HCC shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MA:
$438.53B
HCC:
$5.27B
MA:
$17.28
HCC:
$2.61
MA:
28.43
HCC:
38.28
MA:
1.66
HCC:
0.89
MA:
13.04
HCC:
3.59
MA:
65.24
HCC:
2.39
MA:
$33.94B
HCC:
$1.47B
MA:
$26.70B
HCC:
$887.07M
MA:
$21.23B
HCC:
$296.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MA vs. HCC — Risk / Return Rank
MA
HCC
MA vs. HCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MA | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.36 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 4.75 | -5.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 11.94 | -13.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MA | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | 2.04 | -2.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.85 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.66 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
MA vs. HCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, roughly equal to the maximum HCC drawdown of -64.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and HCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MA | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.67% | -64.81% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.91% | -24.41% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | -45.53% | +24.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.25% | -45.53% | +17.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.64% | -9.39% | -8.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.82% | -18.11% | +8.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.19% | 9.70% | +0.49% |
Volatility
MA vs. HCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is 6.54%, while Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) has a volatility of 23.02%. This indicates that MA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MA | HCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 23.02% | -16.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.46% | 36.12% | -18.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.23% | 56.87% | -34.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 49.64% | -25.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.92% | 52.54% | -25.62% |
Dividends
MA vs. HCC - Dividend Comparison
MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, more than HCC's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc. | 0.32% | 0.36% | 1.51% | 1.90% | 4.45% | 0.78% | 0.94% | 21.85% | 27.91% | 45.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MA Mastercard Incorporated | 0.66% | 0.53% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.56% | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.74% | 0.66% |
Financials
MA vs. HCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mastercard Incorporated and Warrior Met Coal, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MA vs. HCC - Profitability Comparison
MA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.
HCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a gross profit of 450.26M and revenue of 458.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.
MA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.
HCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported an operating income of 79.37M and revenue of 458.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
MA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.
HCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. reported a net income of 72.34M and revenue of 458.59M, resulting in a net margin of 15.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MA and HCC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HCC has higher volatility (23.02%) compared to MA (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MA dropped -62.67% vs HCC's -64.81%.
HCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MA and HCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer