PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MA vs. CB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MA vs. CB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Chubb Limited (CB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MA achieves a -14.65% return, which is significantly lower than CB's 3.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MA has outperformed CB with an annualized return of 18.40%, while CB has yielded a comparatively lower 11.89% annualized return.


MA

1D
-1.10%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
-14.65%
6M
-9.84%
1Y
-17.21%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
18.40%

CB

1D
-1.35%
1M
0.70%
YTD
3.43%
6M
8.96%
1Y
10.97%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
15.72%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MA vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
-14.65%9.04%24.17%23.40%-2.66%1.16%20.19%59.16%25.31%47.69%
CB
Chubb Limited
3.43%14.46%23.89%4.20%15.97%27.85%1.41%22.94%-9.63%12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MA and CB is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2006

0.40

The correlation between MA and CB shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MA:

$433.70B

CB:

$127.01B

EPS

MA:

$17.28

CB:

$28.35

PE Ratio

MA:

28.11

CB:

11.35

PEG Ratio

MA:

1.64

CB:

0.79

PS Ratio

MA:

12.90

CB:

2.67

PB Ratio

MA:

64.52

CB:

1.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

MA:

$33.94B

CB:

$48.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MA:

$26.70B

CB:

$17.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

MA:

$21.23B

CB:

$12.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MA vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MA
MA Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CB
CB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MA vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MACBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.12

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

1.18

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.68

2.70

-4.38

MA vs. CB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MA Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the CB Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MA and CB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MACBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.78

0.62

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.78

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.50

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.40

+0.43

Drawdowns

MA vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MA drawdown since its inception was -62.67%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MA and CB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MACBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.67%

-50.99%

-11.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.91%

-9.36%

-11.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-14.35%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.25%

-19.26%

-8.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.00%

-42.59%

+1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.55%

-5.81%

-12.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-10.68%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.26%

4.52%

+5.74%

Volatility

MA vs. CB - Volatility Comparison

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) and Chubb Limited (CB) have volatilities of 6.33% and 6.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MACBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

6.11%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.37%

13.14%

+4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.28%

17.69%

+4.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.99%

20.34%

+3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.93%

23.69%

+3.24%

Dividends

MA vs. CB - Dividend Comparison

MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than CB's 1.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CB
Chubb Limited
1.21%1.22%1.30%1.51%1.49%1.65%2.01%1.91%2.24%1.93%2.07%4.23%
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
0.67%0.53%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%

Financials

MA vs. CB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mastercard Incorporated and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
8.40B
1.88B
(MA) Total Revenue
(CB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MA and CB have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MA has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to CB (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MA dropped -62.67% vs CB's -50.99%.

CB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MA and CB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer