PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LYTS vs. RING
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LYTS vs. RING

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

LYTS (LSI Industries Inc.) is a stock, while RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. Over the past 10 years, LYTS returned 11.66%/yr vs 13.85%/yr for RING. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LYTS vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYTS achieves a 40.24% return, which is significantly higher than RING's -5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, LYTS has underperformed RING with an annualized return of 11.66%, while RING has yielded a comparatively higher 13.85% annualized return.

LYTS

1D
-0.78%
1M
7.52%
YTD
40.24%
6M
33.74%
1Y
55.62%
3Y*
29.03%
5Y*
26.89%
10Y*
11.66%

RING

1D
3.20%
1M
-16.79%
YTD
-5.54%
6M
-4.18%
1Y
56.55%
3Y*
44.87%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
13.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYTS vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYTS
LSI Industries Inc.		40.24%-4.68%39.69%16.79%82.88%-17.98%45.70%100.79%-52.25%-27.41%
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF		-5.54%164.72%15.98%12.29%-15.40%-7.46%24.98%49.92%-13.14%10.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LYTS and RING is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LSI Industries Inc.

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

Often compared with LYTS:
LYTS vs. LGLLYTS vs. SANMLYTS vs. QQQLYTS vs. AYILYTS vs. SPYLYTS vs. AQSTLYTS vs. GOOGL
Often compared with RING:
RING vs. GDXRING vs. GLDRING vs. SLVPRING vs. AUMIRING vs. GOLDRING vs. FGDLRING vs. SPY

Return for Risk

LYTS vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LYTS
LYTS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LYTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYTS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
LYTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
RING
RING Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYTS vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

LYTSRINGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.37
1.20

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.21
1.62

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

1.59

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

4.45

+0.11

LYTS vs. RING - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the RING Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYTS and RING, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYTS vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYTS drawdown since its inception was -85.55%, which is greater than RING's maximum drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYTS and RING.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LYTSRINGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.55%

-79.47%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.42%

-35.72%

+8.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.60%

-35.72%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.60%

-47.94%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.19%

-52.04%

-24.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-30.03%

+29.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.21%

-47.36%

+9.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.22%

12.74%

-0.52%

Volatility

LYTS vs. RING - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) is 12.58%, while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a volatility of 16.83%. This indicates that LYTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LYTSRINGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.58%

16.83%

-4.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.84%

39.11%

-10.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.80%

47.31%

-6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.84%

36.81%

+7.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.12%

36.70%

+11.42%

Dividends

LYTS vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

LYTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than RING's 0.89% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYTS
LSI Industries Inc.		0.78%1.09%1.03%1.42%1.63%2.92%2.34%3.31%6.31%2.91%2.05%0.98%
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF		0.89%0.84%1.43%2.01%2.29%2.38%0.83%0.83%0.70%0.42%1.41%0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

LYTS and RING have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RING has higher volatility (16.83%) compared to LYTS (12.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYTS dropped -85.55% vs RING's -79.47%.

LYTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYTS and RING

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer