LYTS vs. SANM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM).

Performance

LYTS vs. SANM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LYTS vs. SANM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LYTS LSI Industries Inc.	2.58%	-4.68%	39.69%	16.79%	82.88%	-17.98%	45.70%	100.79%	-52.25%	-27.41%
SANM Sanmina Corporation	-13.25%	98.32%	47.30%	-10.33%	38.18%	30.01%	-6.86%	42.31%	-27.09%	-9.96%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LYTS : $594.09M SANM : $7.23B
EPS LYTS : $0.82 SANM : $4.20
PE Ratio LYTS : 22.90 SANM : 31.01
PEG Ratio LYTS : 0.44 SANM : 6.77
PS Ratio LYTS : 0.99 SANM : 0.77
Total Revenue (TTM) LYTS : $591.80M SANM : $9.31B
Gross Profit (TTM) LYTS : $150.98M SANM : $790.80M
EBITDA (TTM) LYTS : $44.93M SANM : $429.31M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYTS achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly higher than SANM's -13.25% return. Over the past 10 years, LYTS has underperformed SANM with an annualized return of 7.36%, while SANM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.76% annualized return.

LYTS

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -12.63%
• YTD: 2.58%
• 6M: -20.59%
• 1Y: 9.13%
• 3Y*: 11.78%
• 5Y*: 17.91%
• 10Y*: 7.36%

SANM

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -8.52%
• YTD: -13.25%
• 6M: 11.72%
• 1Y: 71.20%
• 3Y*: 28.75%
• 5Y*: 25.30%
• 10Y*: 18.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LYTS vs. SANM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYTS

LYTS Risk / Return Rank: 48
LYTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
LYTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
LYTS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
LYTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
LYTS Martin Ratio Rank: 51

SANM

SANM Risk / Return Rank: 76
SANM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
SANM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
SANM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
SANM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
SANM Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYTS vs. SANM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LYTS	SANM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	1.11	-0.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	1.79	-1.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.26	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	2.17	-1.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.95	5.79	-4.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LYTS vs. SANM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYTS Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the SANM Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYTS and SANM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LYTS	SANM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	1.11	-0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.60	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	0.46	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.16	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between LYTS and SANM is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LYTS vs. SANM - Dividend Comparison

LYTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while SANM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LYTS LSI Industries Inc.	1.07%	1.09%	1.03%	1.42%	1.63%	2.92%	2.34%	3.31%	6.31%	2.91%	2.05%	0.98%
SANM Sanmina Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LYTS vs. SANM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYTS drawdown since its inception was -85.55%, smaller than the maximum SANM drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYTS and SANM.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYTS	SANM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.55%	-99.66%	+14.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.42%	-32.69%	+5.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.60%	-33.92%	-6.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.22%	-55.85%	-23.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.18%	-63.23%	+40.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.38%	-71.63%	+33.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.09%	12.24%	-0.15%

Volatility

LYTS vs. SANM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) is 8.52%, while Sanmina Corporation (SANM) has a volatility of 17.22%. This indicates that LYTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SANM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYTS	SANM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.52%	17.22%	-8.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.77%	54.33%	-26.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.75%	64.70%	-23.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.80%	42.62%	+1.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.98%	41.18%	+6.80%

Financials

LYTS vs. SANM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LSI Industries Inc. and Sanmina Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LYTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, LSI Industries Inc. reported a gross profit of 37.43M and revenue of 147.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.5%.

SANM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a gross profit of 242.36M and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.6%.

LYTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, LSI Industries Inc. reported an operating income of 8.87M and revenue of 147.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

SANM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported an operating income of 73.60M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

LYTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, LSI Industries Inc. reported a net income of 6.35M and revenue of 147.00M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

SANM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a net income of 49.29M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.