PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYTS vs. SANM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LYTS vs. SANM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYTS achieves a 25.22% return, which is significantly lower than SANM's 88.39% return. Over the past 10 years, LYTS has underperformed SANM with an annualized return of 10.35%, while SANM has yielded a comparatively higher 26.22% annualized return.


LYTS

1D
-5.19%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
25.22%
6M
24.00%
1Y
41.86%
3Y*
25.13%
5Y*
23.07%
10Y*
10.35%

SANM

1D
1.57%
1M
30.56%
YTD
88.39%
6M
79.55%
1Y
220.69%
3Y*
73.47%
5Y*
46.07%
10Y*
26.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYTS vs. SANM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYTS
LSI Industries Inc.
25.22%-4.68%39.69%16.79%82.88%-17.98%45.70%100.79%-52.25%-27.41%
SANM
Sanmina Corporation
88.39%98.32%47.30%-10.33%38.18%30.01%-6.86%42.31%-27.09%-9.96%

Correlation

The correlation between LYTS and SANM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 1993

0.25

The correlation between LYTS and SANM shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.43 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LYTS:

$739.72M

SANM:

$15.64B

EPS

LYTS:

$0.76

SANM:

$4.72

PE Ratio

LYTS:

30.24

SANM:

59.85

PEG Ratio

LYTS:

0.59

SANM:

11.67

PS Ratio

LYTS:

1.18

SANM:

1.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

LYTS:

$609.84M

SANM:

$11.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LYTS:

$156.38M

SANM:

$968.36M

EBITDA (TTM)

LYTS:

$39.60M

SANM:

$365.81M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYTS vs. SANM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYTS
LYTS Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
LYTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYTS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
LYTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYTS Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SANM
SANM Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SANM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SANM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SANM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SANM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SANM Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYTS vs. SANM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYTSSANMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.51

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

6.80

-5.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.44

17.17

-13.73

LYTS vs. SANM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the SANM Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYTS and SANM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYTSSANMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

3.34

-2.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

1.05

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.63

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.21

-0.06

Drawdowns

LYTS vs. SANM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYTS drawdown since its inception was -85.55%, smaller than the maximum SANM drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYTS and SANM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYTSSANMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.55%

-99.66%

+14.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.42%

-32.69%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.60%

-32.69%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.60%

-33.92%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.19%

-55.85%

-20.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.68%

-20.14%

+12.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.24%

-71.47%

+33.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.20%

12.91%

-0.71%

Volatility

LYTS vs. SANM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) is 10.36%, while Sanmina Corporation (SANM) has a volatility of 14.20%. This indicates that LYTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SANM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYTSSANMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.36%

14.20%

-3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.96%

48.36%

-20.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.09%

66.55%

-26.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.73%

44.06%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.08%

41.84%

+6.24%

Dividends

LYTS vs. SANM - Dividend Comparison

LYTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while SANM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYTS
LSI Industries Inc.
0.88%1.09%1.03%1.42%1.63%2.92%2.34%3.31%6.31%2.91%2.05%0.98%
SANM
Sanmina Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LYTS vs. SANM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LSI Industries Inc. and Sanmina Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
150.53M
4.01B
(LYTS) Total Revenue
(SANM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LYTS vs. SANM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LSI Industries Inc. and Sanmina Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
26.4%
8.9%
Portfolio components
LYTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSI Industries Inc. reported a gross profit of 39.72M and revenue of 150.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.4%.

SANM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a gross profit of 354.98M and revenue of 4.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.9%.

LYTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSI Industries Inc. reported an operating income of 3.81M and revenue of 150.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.

SANM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported an operating income of 157.01M and revenue of 4.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.

LYTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LSI Industries Inc. reported a net income of 2.09M and revenue of 150.53M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.

SANM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a net income of 93.65M and revenue of 4.01B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LYTS and SANM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SANM has higher volatility (14.20%) compared to LYTS (10.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYTS dropped -85.55% vs SANM's -99.66%.

SANM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYTS and SANM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer