PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYSDY vs. SSRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LYSDY vs. SSRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYSDY achieves a 52.00% return, which is significantly higher than SSRM's 24.22% return. Over the past 10 years, LYSDY has outperformed SSRM with an annualized return of 74.15%, while SSRM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.


LYSDY

1D
2.53%
1M
-12.53%
YTD
52.00%
6M
49.64%
1Y
118.23%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
23.19%
10Y*
74.15%

SSRM

1D
3.46%
1M
-21.64%
YTD
24.22%
6M
22.60%
1Y
119.07%
3Y*
25.15%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYSDY vs. SSRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYSDY
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR
52.00%109.37%-18.22%-8.17%-29.21%144.41%79.88%50.87%489.58%258.76%
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
24.22%214.94%-35.32%-29.94%-10.02%-10.90%4.41%59.31%37.54%-1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LYSDY and SSRM is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2010

0.13

The correlation between LYSDY and SSRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LYSDY:

$12.36B

SSRM:

$5.93B

EPS

LYSDY:

A$0.14

SSRM:

$3.27

PE Ratio

LYSDY:

130.43

SSRM:

8.34

PEG Ratio

LYSDY:

20.07

SSRM:

0.13

PS Ratio

LYSDY:

14.42

SSRM:

3.11

PB Ratio

LYSDY:

5.23

SSRM:

1.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

LYSDY:

A$1.19B

SSRM:

$1.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LYSDY:

A$301.27M

SSRM:

$643.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

LYSDY:

A$236.57M

SSRM:

$835.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYSDY vs. SSRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYSDY
LYSDY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
LYSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LYSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SSRM
SSRM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SSRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSRM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SSRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSRM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYSDY vs. SSRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYSDYSSRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

3.83

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.33

9.89

-4.55

LYSDY vs. SSRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYSDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the SSRM Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYSDY and SSRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYSDY vs. SSRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYSDY drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than SSRM's maximum drawdown of -91.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYSDY and SSRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYSDYSSRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.93%

-91.68%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.39%

-31.28%

-15.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.39%

-73.41%

+27.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.25%

-83.16%

+24.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.35%

-83.16%

+10.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.54%

-37.45%

-17.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.48%

-57.15%

-27.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.25%

12.09%

+10.16%

Volatility

LYSDY vs. SSRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) is 17.37%, while SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) has a volatility of 19.31%. This indicates that LYSDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYSDYSSRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.37%

19.31%

-1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.70%

54.27%

-10.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.99%

66.63%

-1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.64%

55.93%

-5.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

278.55%

52.96%

+225.59%

Dividends

LYSDY vs. SSRM - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYSDY nor SSRM has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
LYSDY
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.60%1.79%1.13%

Financials

LYSDY vs. SSRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR and SSR Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M202120222023202420252026
406.10M
581.78M
(LYSDY) Total Revenue
(SSRM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LYSDY values in AUD, SSRM values in USD

LYSDY vs. SSRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR and SSR Mining Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202120222023202420252026
28.2%
0
Portfolio components
LYSDY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 114.53M and revenue of 406.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.

SSRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LYSDY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 79.26M and revenue of 406.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

SSRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.

LYSDY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR reported a net income of 78.74M and revenue of 406.10M, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.

SSRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LYSDY and SSRM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSRM has higher volatility (19.31%) compared to LYSDY (17.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYSDY dropped -99.93% vs SSRM's -91.68%.

LYSDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYSDY and SSRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer