LYMZ.DE vs. QBTX
LYMZ.DE (Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF) and QBTX (Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past year, LYMZ.DE returned 26.14% vs -42.82% for QBTX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LYMZ.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QBTX.
Performance
LYMZ.DE vs. QBTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LYMZ.DE is traded in EUR, while QBTX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QBTX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYMZ.DE achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than QBTX's -51.15% return.
LYMZ.DE
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- 1Y
- 26.14%
- 3Y*
- 25.17%
- 5Y*
- 17.14%
- 10Y*
- 15.82%
QBTX
- 1D
- -27.44%
- 1M
- -15.11%
- YTD
- -51.15%
- 6M
- -59.66%
- 1Y
- -42.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LYMZ.DE vs. QBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LYMZ.DE Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF | 11.52% | 26.94% |
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | -51.15% | 304.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYMZ.DE and QBTX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYMZ.DE vs. QBTX — Risk / Return Rank
LYMZ.DE
QBTX
LYMZ.DE vs. QBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) and Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYMZ.DE | QBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.14 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | -0.45 | +1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | -0.64 | +4.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYMZ.DE | QBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | -0.20 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.35 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
LYMZ.DE vs. QBTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYMZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.31%, smaller than the maximum QBTX drawdown of -95.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMZ.DE and QBTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYMZ.DE | QBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.31% | -95.40% | +11.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.17% | -95.40% | +74.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -88.81% | +87.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.16% | -56.81% | +16.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | 67.50% | -60.87% |
Volatility
LYMZ.DE vs. QBTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) is 9.89%, while Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a volatility of 81.44%. This indicates that LYMZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYMZ.DE | QBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.89% | 81.44% | -71.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.73% | 150.11% | -124.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.86% | 216.34% | -184.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.01% | 243.05% | -208.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.32% | 243.05% | -206.73% |
LYMZ.DE vs. QBTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYMZ.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QBTX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYMZ.DE vs. QBTX - Dividend Comparison
LYMZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LYMZ.DE Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF | 27.54% | 13.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LYMZ.DE and QBTX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYMZ.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYMZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QBTX.
They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LYMZ.DE and 1.30% for QBTX.
Find the right allocation for LYMZ.DE and QBTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer