LYMZ.DE vs. TDAX
LYMZ.DE (Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF) and TDAX (TDAQ Lift ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. LYMZ.DE is passively managed, while TDAX is actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LYMZ.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for TDAX.
Performance
LYMZ.DE vs. TDAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LYMZ.DE is traded in EUR, while TDAX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TDAX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
LYMZ.DE
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 8.80%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 14.15%
- 1Y
- 26.36%
- 3Y*
- 25.17%
- 5Y*
- 17.14%
- 10Y*
- 15.82%
TDAX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 11.91%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LYMZ.DE vs. TDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LYMZ.DE Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF | 6.83% |
TDAX TDAQ Lift ETF | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYMZ.DE and TDAX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYMZ.DE vs. TDAX — Risk / Return Rank
LYMZ.DE
TDAX
LYMZ.DE vs. TDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) and TDAQ Lift ETF (TDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYMZ.DE | TDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYMZ.DE | TDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 2.75 | -2.65 |
Drawdowns
LYMZ.DE vs. TDAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYMZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.31%, which is greater than TDAX's maximum drawdown of -12.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMZ.DE and TDAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYMZ.DE | TDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.31% | -12.83% | -71.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -0.77% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.16% | -3.67% | -36.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.63% | — | — |
Volatility
LYMZ.DE vs. TDAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYMZ.DE | TDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.86% | 22.44% | +9.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.01% | 22.44% | +12.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.32% | 22.44% | +13.88% |
LYMZ.DE vs. TDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYMZ.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TDAX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYMZ.DE vs. TDAX - Dividend Comparison
LYMZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.45%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
LYMZ.DE Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF | 0.00% |
TDAX TDAQ Lift ETF | 7.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LYMZ.DE and TDAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYMZ.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYMZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TDAX.
They also come from different issuers: Amundi and TappAlpha. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LYMZ.DE and 0.98% for TDAX.
Find the right allocation for LYMZ.DE and TDAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer