PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYFT vs. ROKU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LYFT vs. ROKU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and Roku, Inc. (ROKU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYFT achieves a -18.12% return, which is significantly lower than ROKU's 33.66% return.


LYFT

1D
1.99%
1M
6.95%
6M
-5.99%
YTD
-18.12%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
-22.11%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-20.73%

ROKU

1D
-0.06%
1M
3.20%
6M
52.32%
YTD
33.66%
1Y
54.00%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
-19.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
28.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$195.20M$172.22M$199.91M
$351.29M$393.75M$580.85M

LYFT vs. ROKU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
-18.12%50.16%-13.94%36.03%-74.21%-13.03%14.20%-50.69%
ROKU
Roku, Inc.
33.66%45.94%-18.90%125.21%-82.16%-31.27%147.96%107.95%

Correlation

The correlation between LYFT and ROKU is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2019

0.39

The correlation between LYFT and ROKU shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LYFT:

$6.02B

ROKU:

$21.51B

EPS

LYFT:

$6.95

ROKU:

$1.33

PE Ratio

LYFT:

2.28

ROKU:

108.85

PS Ratio

LYFT:

1.00

ROKU:

4.42

PB Ratio

LYFT:

2.11

ROKU:

8.20

Total Revenue (TTM)

LYFT:

$6.52B

ROKU:

$4.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LYFT:

$2.82B

ROKU:

$2.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

LYFT:

$51.76M

ROKU:

$280.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYFT vs. ROKU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LYFT
LYFT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LYFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYFT Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LYFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYFT Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ROKU
ROKU Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ROKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROKU Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ROKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROKU Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LYFT vs. ROKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and Roku, Inc. (ROKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYFTROKUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.24

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

1.96

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.41

5.65

-5.24

LYFT vs. ROKU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYFT Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the ROKU Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYFT and ROKU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYFT vs. ROKU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYFT drawdown since its inception was -90.84%, roughly equal to the maximum ROKU drawdown of -91.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYFT and ROKU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYFTROKUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.84%

-91.91%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.51%

-27.69%

-20.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.23%

-51.65%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.80%

-90.79%

+4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.82%

-69.76%

-12.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.60%

-53.10%

-15.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.44%

9.83%

+21.61%

Volatility

LYFT vs. ROKU - Volatility Comparison

Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) has a higher volatility of 12.06% compared to Roku, Inc. (ROKU) at 3.43%. This indicates that LYFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROKU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYFTROKUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.06%

3.43%

+8.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.83%

34.40%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.41%

46.83%

+4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.54%

66.52%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.89%

74.91%

-7.02%

Dividends

LYFT vs. ROKU - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYFT nor ROKU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LYFT vs. ROKU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lyft, Inc. and Roku, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

LYFT vs. ROKU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lyft, Inc. and Roku, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

LYFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a gross profit of 786.35M and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.6%.

ROKU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roku, Inc. reported a gross profit of 564.94M and revenue of 1.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.2%.

LYFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.33M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.

ROKU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roku, Inc. reported an operating income of 51.77M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

LYFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a net income of 14.25M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.

ROKU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Roku, Inc. reported a net income of 85.70M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LYFT and ROKU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LYFT has higher volatility (12.06%) compared to ROKU (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYFT dropped -90.84% vs ROKU's -91.91%.

ROKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYFT and ROKU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer