LYFT vs. CRM
LYFT (Lyft, Inc.) and CRM (Salesforce, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, LYFT returned -24.75%/yr vs -6.82%/yr for CRM. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LYFT vs. CRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYFT achieves a -30.10% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -37.06% return.
LYFT
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- -30.10%
- 6M
- -33.53%
- 1Y
- -12.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.20%
- 5Y*
- -24.75%
- 10Y*
- —
CRM
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- -37.06%
- 6M
- -36.31%
- 1Y
- -37.22%
- 3Y*
- -6.88%
- 5Y*
- -6.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
LYFT vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYFT Lyft, Inc. | -30.10% | 50.16% | -13.94% | 36.03% | -74.21% | -13.03% | 14.20% | -50.69% |
CRM Salesforce, Inc. | -37.06% | -20.25% | 27.76% | 98.46% | -47.83% | 14.20% | 36.82% | 4.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYFT and CRM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2019 | 0.37 |
The correlation between LYFT and CRM shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LYFT:
$5.45B
CRM:
$144.49B
LYFT:
$6.90
CRM:
$8.59
LYFT:
1.96
CRM:
19.31
LYFT:
0.00
CRM:
0.04
LYFT:
0.86
CRM:
3.62
LYFT:
1.80
CRM:
4.22
LYFT:
$6.52B
CRM:
$42.83B
LYFT:
$2.82B
CRM:
$33.25B
LYFT:
$51.76M
CRM:
$12.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYFT vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank
LYFT
CRM
LYFT vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYFT | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.84 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | -0.95 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | -1.78 | +1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYFT vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYFT drawdown since its inception was -90.84%, which is greater than CRM's maximum drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYFT and CRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYFT | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.84% | -70.50% | -20.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.51% | -39.36% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.23% | -54.70% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.28% | -58.62% | -28.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.48% | -54.33% | -30.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.34% | -16.15% | -52.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.39% | 20.92% | +7.47% |
Volatility
LYFT vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) is 12.55%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 16.76%. This indicates that LYFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYFT | CRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.55% | 16.76% | -4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.16% | 31.59% | +2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.27% | 38.09% | +12.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.44% | 37.07% | +30.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.23% | 35.38% | +32.85% |
Dividends
LYFT vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison
LYFT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRM Salesforce, Inc. | 1.28% | 0.63% | 0.48% |
LYFT Lyft, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LYFT vs. CRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lyft, Inc. and Salesforce, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LYFT vs. CRM - Profitability Comparison
LYFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a gross profit of 786.35M and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.6%.
CRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.56B and revenue of 11.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.9%.
LYFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.33M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
CRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.35B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.
LYFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a net income of 14.25M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.
CRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Salesforce, Inc. reported a net income of 2.11B and revenue of 11.13B, resulting in a net margin of 18.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYFT and CRM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRM has higher volatility (16.76%) compared to LYFT (12.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYFT dropped -90.84% vs CRM's -70.50%.
LYFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.25 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LYFT and CRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer