LVLN vs. XLU
LVLN (SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF) and XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVLN is a Bank Loan fund tracking the S&P USD Select Leveraged Loan Index, while XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. LVLN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLU.
Performance
LVLN vs. XLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVLN achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 4.61% return.
LVLN
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLU
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 3.91%
- 1Y
- 12.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
LVLN vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 0.80% | 1.20% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 4.61% | -3.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVLN and XLU is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVLN vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank
LVLN
XLU
LVLN vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF (LVLN) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVLN | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.40 | +0.95 |
Drawdowns
LVLN vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.34%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVLN and XLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVLN | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -51.98% | +49.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -6.43% | +6.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -10.22% | +9.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.13% | — |
Volatility
LVLN vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVLN | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78% | 14.49% | -11.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 17.32% | -14.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 19.26% | -16.48% |
LVLN vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVLN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVLN vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison
LVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than XLU's 2.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 3.72% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.68% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVLN and XLU have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVLN.
LVLN has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 2.68% for XLU.
LVLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while XLU is Utilities Equities. LVLN tracks S&P USD Select Leveraged Loan Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVLN and 0.08% for XLU.
Find the right allocation for LVLN and XLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer