LVLN vs. SPYM
LVLN (SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVLN is a Bank Loan fund tracking the S&P USD Select Leveraged Loan Index, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVLN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
LVLN vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVLN achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 8.48% return.
LVLN
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYM
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 24.61%
- 3Y*
- 21.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.25%
LVLN vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 0.80% | 1.20% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 8.48% | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVLN and SPYM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVLN vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
LVLN
SPYM
LVLN vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF (LVLN) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVLN | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.61 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
LVLN vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVLN drawdown since its inception was -2.34%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVLN and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVLN | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -54.46% | +52.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -2.90% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -7.15% | +6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.92% | — |
Volatility
LVLN vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVLN | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78% | 12.09% | -9.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 16.83% | -14.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 18.02% | -15.24% |
LVLN vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVLN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVLN vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
LVLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than SPYM's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVLN SPDR S&P Leveraged Loan ETF | 3.72% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVLN and SPYM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVLN.
LVLN has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 1.02% for SPYM.
LVLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while SPYM is S&P 500. LVLN tracks S&P USD Select Leveraged Loan Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVLN and 0.02% for SPYM.
Find the right allocation for LVLN and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer