LVHI vs. XLY
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 15.97%/yr vs 7.00%/yr for XLY. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLY.
Performance
LVHI vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -2.16% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 31.64%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- —
XLY
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
LVHI vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.78% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -2.16% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and XLY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.48 |
LVHI vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
XLY
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
XLY
-
Energy
LVHI
XLY
-
Industrials
LVHI
XLY
Utilities
LVHI
XLY
-
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
XLY
-
Healthcare
LVHI
XLY
-
Basic Materials
LVHI
XLY
-
Communication Services
LVHI
XLY
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
XLY
Real Estate
LVHI
XLY
-
Technology
LVHI
XLY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
XLY
LVHI vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVHI | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.10 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.23 | 0.67 | +4.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.61 | 2.05 | +19.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and XLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -59.05% | +26.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -14.98% | +8.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -26.01% | +14.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -39.67% | +27.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.17% | +6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -9.55% | +6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.48% | 4.88% | -3.40% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.78%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 6.19% | -3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.72% | 13.44% | -5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.60% | 18.27% | -8.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.08% | 23.83% | -12.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 22.08% | -8.33% |
LVHI vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than XLY's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.69% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and XLY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLY has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to LVHI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs XLY's -59.05%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.97% vs 7.00% for XLY. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while XLY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.13% for XLY.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and XLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer