LVHI vs. GCOW
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 15.66%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for GCOW. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.
Performance
LVHI vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than GCOW's 11.34% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 13.06%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- 1Y
- 31.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 15.66%
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 23.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
LVHI vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.06% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 11.34% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | -4.33% | 17.81% | -7.99% | 20.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and GCOW is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.70 |
The correlation between LVHI and GCOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
LVHI vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
GCOW
Financial Services
-
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
GCOW
-
Energy
LVHI
GCOW
Industrials
LVHI
GCOW
Utilities
LVHI
GCOW
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
GCOW
Healthcare
LVHI
GCOW
Basic Materials
LVHI
GCOW
Communication Services
LVHI
GCOW
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
GCOW
Real Estate
LVHI
GCOW
-
Technology
LVHI
GCOW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
GCOW
LVHI vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVHI | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.37 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | 4.91 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.39 | 12.49 | +8.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and GCOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -37.64% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -4.77% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -12.35% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -21.48% | +9.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -3.46% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -5.83% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 1.88% | -0.41% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) have volatilities of 2.83% and 2.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 2.74% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.76% | 8.07% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.63% | 10.92% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.09% | 13.51% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 16.18% | -2.43% |
LVHI vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, which matches GCOW's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.72% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.72% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and GCOW have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHI has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to GCOW (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs GCOW's -37.64%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.66% vs 12.27% for GCOW. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.
LVHI and GCOW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 4.72%.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.60% for GCOW.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and GCOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer