PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHI vs. FNDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHI vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 19.66% return.


LVHI

1D
0.49%
1M
1.30%
YTD
13.78%
6M
14.96%
1Y
31.64%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
15.97%
10Y*

FNDF

1D
0.39%
1M
1.01%
YTD
19.66%
6M
21.60%
1Y
40.25%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHI vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
13.78%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%12.26%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
19.66%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%3.61%18.46%-14.21%23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHI and FNDF is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016

0.72

The correlation between LVHI and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

LVHI vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHI
FNDF

Financial Services

23.6%
16.7%

Energy

17.4%
12.3%

Industrials

13.4%
15.9%

Utilities

10.4%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
6.9%

Healthcare

7.4%
5.5%

Basic Materials

6.1%
11.3%

Communication Services

5.8%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
10.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.9%

Technology

0.1%
11.1%

Financial Services

LVHI
23.6%
FNDF
16.7%

Energy

LVHI
17.4%
FNDF
12.3%

Industrials

LVHI
13.4%
FNDF
15.9%

Utilities

LVHI
10.4%
FNDF
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

LVHI
8.7%
FNDF
6.9%

Healthcare

LVHI
7.4%
FNDF
5.5%

Basic Materials

LVHI
6.1%
FNDF
11.3%

Communication Services

LVHI
5.8%
FNDF
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHI
5.3%
FNDF
10.7%

Real Estate

LVHI
1.9%
FNDF
0.9%

Technology

LVHI
0.1%
FNDF
11.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHI vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHI vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHIFNDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.45

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.23

3.82

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.61

14.27

+7.35

LVHI vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHI Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is higher than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHI and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHI vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and FNDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHIFNDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-40.14%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-10.60%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.99%

-13.89%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

-25.56%

+13.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.94%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-7.63%

+4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

2.84%

-1.36%

Volatility

LVHI vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.78%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHIFNDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

6.65%

-3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

13.64%

-5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.60%

16.00%

-6.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.08%

16.35%

-5.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

17.71%

-3.96%

LVHI vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHI vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than FNDF's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
2.87%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.69%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHI and FNDF have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDF has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to LVHI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.97% vs 13.11% for FNDF. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 2.87% for FNDF.

LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.25% for FNDF.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHI and FNDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer