PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHD vs. TAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHD vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -6.17% return.


LVHD

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
6.72%
6M
6.51%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
8.03%

TAIL

1D
-0.05%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
-6.17%
6M
-7.55%
1Y
-8.73%
3Y*
-5.76%
5Y*
-8.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHD vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
6.72%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%5.86%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
-6.17%5.48%-9.62%-13.29%-13.13%-12.81%6.91%-14.27%2.85%-7.70%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHD and TAIL is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

-0.38

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between LVHD and TAIL has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.38 to -0.06, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

LVHD vs. TAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHD
TAIL

Utilities

25.5%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

18.5%
4.9%

Real Estate

15.0%
1.9%

Financial Services

8.6%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
10.1%

Energy

6.7%
3.5%

Technology

5.9%
35.6%

Industrials

4.6%
8.3%

Healthcare

4.6%
8.5%

Communication Services

3.8%
11.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Utilities

LVHD
25.5%
TAIL
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

LVHD
18.5%
TAIL
4.9%

Real Estate

LVHD
15.0%
TAIL
1.9%

Financial Services

LVHD
8.6%
TAIL
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHD
6.8%
TAIL
10.1%

Energy

LVHD
6.7%
TAIL
3.5%

Technology

LVHD
5.9%
TAIL
35.6%

Industrials

LVHD
4.6%
TAIL
8.3%

Healthcare

LVHD
4.6%
TAIL
8.5%

Communication Services

LVHD
3.8%
TAIL
11.2%

Basic Materials

LVHD

-

TAIL
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHD vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

TAIL
TAIL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
TAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHD vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVHDTAILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.83

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

-0.80

+2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.98

-2.01

+5.99

LVHD vs. TAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the TAIL Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHD and TAIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVHDTAILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

-1.03

+2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

-0.57

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

-0.48

+1.05

Drawdowns

LVHD vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and TAIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHDTAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-52.36%

+15.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-10.95%

+4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-20.65%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

-38.44%

+21.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.84%

-51.56%

+46.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-29.12%

+25.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

4.35%

-1.93%

Volatility

LVHD vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison

Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 0.86%. This indicates that LVHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHDTAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

0.86%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.64%

6.45%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

8.51%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

14.90%

-2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

14.94%

+0.56%

LVHD vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHD vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison

LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than TAIL's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.40%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
3.49%2.88%3.48%3.74%1.50%0.49%0.36%1.58%1.52%0.91%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHD and TAIL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVHD has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to TAIL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs TAIL's -52.36%.

On 5-year performance, LVHD leads with 6.06% vs -8.38% for TAIL. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 6.06% return vs -8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TAIL.

TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 3.40% for LVHD.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 0.59% for TAIL.

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHD and TAIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer