PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHD vs. GBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHD vs. GBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly higher than GBTC's -27.82% return. Over the past 10 years, LVHD has underperformed GBTC with an annualized return of 8.41%, while GBTC has yielded a comparatively higher 46.47% annualized return.


LVHD

1D
0.64%
1M
3.86%
YTD
10.95%
6M
10.48%
1Y
13.29%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
8.41%

GBTC

1D
0.04%
1M
-20.21%
YTD
-27.82%
6M
-30.09%
1Y
-41.39%
3Y*
55.55%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
46.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHD vs. GBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
10.95%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
-27.82%-7.65%113.81%317.61%-75.80%7.03%290.72%106.56%-82.10%1,787.72%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHD and GBTC is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015

0.12

The correlation between LVHD and GBTC shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHD vs. GBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GBTC
GBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHD vs. GBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHDGBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.85

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

-0.79

+2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

-1.39

+6.82

LVHD vs. GBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the GBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHD and GBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHD vs. GBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, smaller than the maximum GBTC drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and GBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHDGBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-89.91%

+52.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-52.45%

+46.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-52.45%

+38.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

-85.42%

+68.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-89.91%

+52.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-49.87%

+48.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-43.43%

+39.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

29.85%

-27.39%

Volatility

LVHD vs. GBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) is 3.54%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) has a volatility of 11.97%. This indicates that LVHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHDGBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

11.97%

-8.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

34.41%

-27.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.77%

44.01%

-34.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.91%

62.25%

-49.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

81.84%

-66.32%

LVHD vs. GBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than GBTC's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHD vs. GBTC - Dividend Comparison

LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, while GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.61%0.00%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.27%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHD and GBTC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GBTC has higher volatility (11.97%) compared to LVHD (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs GBTC's -89.91%.

On 10-year performance, GBTC leads with 46.47% vs 8.41% for LVHD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GBTC has performed better with a 46.47% return vs 8.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GBTC.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.00% for GBTC.

LVHD is categorized as Dividend, while GBTC is Cryptocurrency. LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while GBTC tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 1.50% for GBTC.

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHD and GBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer