PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHD vs. EWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHD vs. EWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly higher than EWL's 4.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LVHD has underperformed EWL with an annualized return of 8.41%, while EWL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.


LVHD

1D
0.64%
1M
3.86%
YTD
10.95%
6M
10.48%
1Y
13.29%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
8.41%

EWL

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.55%
YTD
4.60%
6M
7.45%
1Y
13.57%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHD vs. EWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
10.95%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
4.60%32.92%-2.80%17.67%-18.89%20.20%11.80%31.58%-9.21%23.34%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHD and EWL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015

0.53

The correlation between LVHD and EWL shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LVHD vs. EWL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHD
EWL

Utilities

25.5%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

18.5%
14.9%

Real Estate

15.0%
0.9%

Financial Services

8.6%
18.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
5.4%

Energy

6.7%

-

Technology

5.9%
0.9%

Industrials

4.6%
12.0%

Healthcare

4.6%
38.8%

Communication Services

3.8%
1.3%

Basic Materials

-

6.6%

Utilities

LVHD
25.5%
EWL
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

LVHD
18.5%
EWL
14.9%

Real Estate

LVHD
15.0%
EWL
0.9%

Financial Services

LVHD
8.6%
EWL
18.6%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHD
6.8%
EWL
5.4%

Energy

LVHD
6.7%
EWL

-

Technology

LVHD
5.9%
EWL
0.9%

Industrials

LVHD
4.6%
EWL
12.0%

Healthcare

LVHD
4.6%
EWL
38.8%

Communication Services

LVHD
3.8%
EWL
1.3%

Basic Materials

LVHD

-

EWL
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHD vs. EWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

EWL
EWL Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWL Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWL Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHD vs. EWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHDEWLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.15

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.01

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

3.24

+2.19

LVHD vs. EWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the EWL Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHD and EWL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHD vs. EWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, smaller than the maximum EWL drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and EWL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHDEWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-51.62%

+14.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-13.48%

+7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-13.48%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

-28.99%

+12.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-28.99%

-8.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-3.63%

+2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-11.08%

+7.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

4.22%

-1.76%

Volatility

LVHD vs. EWL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) is 3.54%, while iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that LVHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHDEWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

5.12%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

12.70%

-5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.77%

16.09%

-6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.91%

16.13%

-3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

16.47%

-0.95%

LVHD vs. EWL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than EWL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHD vs. EWL - Dividend Comparison

LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than EWL's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
1.63%1.71%2.21%2.12%2.04%1.73%1.45%1.85%2.56%2.05%2.75%2.58%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.27%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHD and EWL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWL has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to LVHD (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs EWL's -51.62%.

On 10-year performance, EWL leads with 10.14% vs 8.41% for LVHD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWL has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 8.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWL.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.63% for EWL.

LVHD is categorized as Dividend, while EWL is Europe Equities. LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while EWL tracks MSCI Switzerland Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 0.50% for EWL.

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHD and EWL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer