PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVAFX vs. MBXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVAFX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVAFX achieves a 17.34% return, which is significantly higher than MBXIX's 12.91% return. Over the past 10 years, LVAFX has outperformed MBXIX with an annualized return of 8.15%, while MBXIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.68% annualized return.


LVAFX

1D
0.31%
1M
5.72%
6M
12.90%
YTD
17.34%
1Y
29.64%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
8.15%
ALL TIME*
7.57%

MBXIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.01%
6M
8.54%
YTD
12.91%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
7.68%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LVAFX vs. MBXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVAFX
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund
17.34%22.33%0.10%9.81%-4.04%17.36%-5.16%17.54%-6.47%18.68%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
12.91%4.35%13.49%-0.67%7.72%16.89%-0.45%13.83%-2.16%13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between LVAFX and MBXIX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2015

0.49

The correlation between LVAFX and MBXIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVAFX vs. MBXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LVAFX
LVAFX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LVAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MBXIX
MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LVAFX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVAFXMBXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.40

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

3.88

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.92

14.92

+3.00

LVAFX vs. MBXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVAFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.40, which is higher than the MBXIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVAFX and MBXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVAFX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, which is greater than MBXIX's maximum drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVAFX and MBXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVAFXMBXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-31.73%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.76%

-3.85%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.52%

-15.59%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.34%

-15.59%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

-31.73%

-1.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.68%

+2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-3.95%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.04%

+0.57%

Volatility

LVAFX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison

LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) at 1.59%. This indicates that LVAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVAFXMBXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

1.59%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.55%

4.89%

+1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.51%

6.90%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.24%

11.40%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.53%

13.36%

+0.17%

LVAFX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVAFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXIX's 2.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVAFX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison

LVAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, while MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVAFX
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund
8.67%10.17%2.71%15.64%2.90%2.90%2.14%7.62%3.59%7.10%1.66%1.74%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%2.63%2.25%7.74%0.00%4.27%5.18%3.33%3.33%1.91%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVAFX and MBXIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVAFX has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to MBXIX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVAFX dropped -33.69% vs MBXIX's -31.73%.

LVAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVAFX and MBXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer