PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MBXIX vs. CMNIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MBXIX and CMNIX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

MBXIX vs. CMNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class (CMNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.00%
3.77%
MBXIX
CMNIX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MBXIX:

1.43

CMNIX:

4.01

Sortino Ratio

MBXIX:

1.98

CMNIX:

6.33

Omega Ratio

MBXIX:

1.27

CMNIX:

2.02

Calmar Ratio

MBXIX:

1.83

CMNIX:

2.38

Martin Ratio

MBXIX:

4.79

CMNIX:

57.81

Ulcer Index

MBXIX:

3.20%

CMNIX:

0.13%

Daily Std Dev

MBXIX:

10.74%

CMNIX:

1.94%

Max Drawdown

MBXIX:

-31.73%

CMNIX:

-22.81%

Current Drawdown

MBXIX:

-0.47%

CMNIX:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBXIX achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly higher than CMNIX's 0.47% return.


MBXIX

YTD

3.94%

1M

3.73%

6M

3.99%

1Y

14.16%

5Y*

6.66%

10Y*

N/A

CMNIX

YTD

0.47%

1M

0.67%

6M

3.77%

1Y

7.70%

5Y*

3.69%

10Y*

3.05%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MBXIX vs. CMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBXIX has a 2.04% expense ratio, which is higher than CMNIX's 0.90% expense ratio.


MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
Expense ratio chart for MBXIX: current value at 2.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.04%
Expense ratio chart for CMNIX: current value at 0.90% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.90%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MBXIX vs. CMNIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBXIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MBXIX is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MBXIX is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MBXIX is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MBXIX is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MBXIX is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MBXIX is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

CMNIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMNIX is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMNIX is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMNIX is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMNIX is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMNIX is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMNIX is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MBXIX vs. CMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class (CMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MBXIX, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.434.01
The chart of Sortino ratio for MBXIX, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.986.33
The chart of Omega ratio for MBXIX, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.272.02
The chart of Calmar ratio for MBXIX, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.832.38
The chart of Martin ratio for MBXIX, currently valued at 4.79, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.004.7957.81
MBXIX
CMNIX

The current MBXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the CMNIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBXIX and CMNIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.43
4.01
MBXIX
CMNIX

Dividends

MBXIX vs. CMNIX - Dividend Comparison

MBXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than CMNIX's 1.99% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
1.80%1.88%1.84%4.16%0.00%4.27%5.18%1.77%0.00%1.32%0.00%0.00%
CMNIX
Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class
1.99%2.00%2.31%1.02%0.46%0.90%1.56%1.78%1.40%1.41%1.35%1.22%

Drawdowns

MBXIX vs. CMNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBXIX drawdown since its inception was -31.73%, which is greater than CMNIX's maximum drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBXIX and CMNIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.47%
0
MBXIX
CMNIX

Volatility

MBXIX vs. CMNIX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) has a higher volatility of 2.64% compared to Calamos Market Neutral Income Fund Institutional Class (CMNIX) at 0.41%. This indicates that MBXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.64%
0.41%
MBXIX
CMNIX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab