MBXIX vs. EBSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX).
MBXIX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 31, 1996. EBSIX is managed by Campbell & Company. It was launched on Mar 4, 2013.
Performance
MBXIX vs. EBSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MBXIX vs. EBSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I | 8.00% | 4.35% | 13.49% | -0.67% | 7.72% | 16.89% | 14.22% |
EBSIX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares | 7.80% | -1.14% | 11.63% | -1.83% | 30.91% | 9.05% | 4.94% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MBXIX having a 8.00% return and EBSIX slightly lower at 7.80%.
MBXIX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 14.74%
- 3Y*
- 9.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
EBSIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- 1Y
- 1.08%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MBXIX vs. EBSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBXIX has a 2.04% expense ratio, which is higher than EBSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MBXIX vs. EBSIX — Risk / Return Rank
MBXIX
EBSIX
MBXIX vs. EBSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) and Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MBXIX | EBSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 0.21 | +1.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 0.34 | +1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.04 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 0.23 | +1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | 0.38 | +5.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBXIX | EBSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 0.21 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 1.01 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.15 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between MBXIX and EBSIX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MBXIX vs. EBSIX - Dividend Comparison
MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EBSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBXIX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.63% | 2.25% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 4.27% | 5.18% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 1.91% |
EBSIX Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares | 2.93% | 3.16% | 2.90% | 1.82% | 15.10% | 7.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MBXIX vs. EBSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBXIX drawdown since its inception was -31.73%, which is greater than EBSIX's maximum drawdown of -10.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBXIX and EBSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBXIX | EBSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.73% | -10.96% | -20.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.28% | -7.43% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.59% | -10.96% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | 0.00% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | -3.13% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 4.37% | -1.98% |
Volatility
MBXIX vs. EBSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) is 2.37%, while Campbell Systematic Macro Fund Class I Shares (EBSIX) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that MBXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MBXIX | EBSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.37% | 3.04% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.27% | 6.19% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 8.50% | +3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.76% | 9.59% | +2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.45% | 9.52% | +3.93% |