LVAFX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
LVAFX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 24, 2014. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
LVAFX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LVAFX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund | 2.95% | 22.33% | 16.10% | 9.81% | -4.04% | 17.36% | -5.16% | 17.54% | -6.47% | 18.68% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVAFX achieves a 2.95% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, LVAFX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 8.89%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
LVAFX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -5.26%
- YTD
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 17.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.88%
- 10Y*
- 8.89%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LVAFX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVAFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LVAFX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
LVAFX
CSUAX
LVAFX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LVAFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 1.63 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 2.17 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.36 | -0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.99 | 10.32 | -1.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVAFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 1.63 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.61 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.50 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.55 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between LVAFX and CSUAX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LVAFX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
LVAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.88%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund | 9.88% | 10.17% | 18.36% | 15.64% | 2.90% | 2.90% | 2.14% | 7.62% | 3.59% | 7.10% | 1.66% | 1.74% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
LVAFX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVAFX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVAFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.69% | -52.20% | +18.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -7.98% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.34% | -20.45% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.69% | -35.05% | +1.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.26% | -4.38% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -8.49% | +4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 1.83% | +0.08% |
Volatility
LVAFX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) is 3.00%, while Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that LVAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LVAFX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 3.26% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.10% | 6.89% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.10% | 11.48% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 12.89% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.32% | 14.89% | -1.57% |