LU vs. PAYO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

LU (Lufax Holding Ltd) and PAYO (Payoneer Global Inc.) are both stocks. LU operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while PAYO operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 3 years, LU returned -20.35%/yr vs 4.53%/yr for PAYO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LU vs. PAYO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) and Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LU achieves a -46.09% return, which is significantly lower than PAYO's -8.54% return.

LU

• 1D: -4.83%
• 1M: -29.23%
• YTD: -46.09%
• 6M: -47.92%
• 1Y: -52.41%
• 3Y*: -20.35%
• 5Y*: -40.10%
• 10Y*: —

PAYO

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: -8.54%
• 6M: -9.03%
• 1Y: -26.88%
• 3Y*: 4.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LU vs. PAYO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LU Lufax Holding Ltd	-46.09%	7.11%	73.97%	-58.03%	-60.48%	-51.72%
PAYO Payoneer Global Inc.	-8.54%	-44.02%	92.71%	-4.75%	-25.58%	-30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LU and PAYO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021	0.26

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) LU : $31.92B PAYO : $1.07B
Gross Profit (TTM) LU : $13.50B PAYO : $660.73M
EBITDA (TTM) LU : -$1.26B PAYO : $204.88M

Return for Risk

LU vs. PAYO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LU

LU Risk / Return Rank: 8
LU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
LU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
LU Omega Ratio Rank: 7
LU Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LU Martin Ratio Rank: 9

PAYO

PAYO Risk / Return Rank: 18
PAYO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
PAYO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
PAYO Omega Ratio Rank: 19
PAYO Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
PAYO Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LU vs. PAYO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) and Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LU	PAYO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.99	-0.57	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.62	-0.58	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	0.93	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	-0.64	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.39	-1.13	-0.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LU vs. PAYO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LU Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the PAYO Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LU and PAYO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LU	PAYO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.99	-0.57	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.49	-0.25	-0.25

Drawdowns

LU vs. PAYO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LU drawdown since its inception was -96.68%, which is greater than PAYO's maximum drawdown of -67.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LU and PAYO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LU	PAYO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.68%	-67.91%	-28.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.64%	-42.45%	-26.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.41%	-61.36%	-8.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.24%	-53.48%	-41.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-78.40%	-41.47%	-36.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.82%	23.74%	+14.08%

Volatility

LU vs. PAYO - Volatility Comparison

Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) and Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) have volatilities of 12.14% and 12.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LU	PAYO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.14%	12.41%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.52%	37.67%	-3.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.08%	47.16%	+5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	76.63%	55.61%	+21.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	76.25%	55.61%	+20.64%

Dividends

LU vs. PAYO - Dividend Comparison

Neither LU nor PAYO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LU Lufax Holding Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	101.26%	11.60%	26.29%
PAYO Payoneer Global Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LU and PAYO in my portfolio?

LU and PAYO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LU or PAYO?

PAYO has higher volatility (12.41%) compared to LU (12.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LU dropped -96.68% vs PAYO's -67.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAYO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.